Non Site Allocation Representations Report.pdf

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES Policy DP/4 Development Criteria Rep No Name 195 RWE Npower Renewables (Mr Martin Cole) [474] 1 Summary 4.23 POLICY DP/4 - DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA While NRL agrees with the 'where appropriate' caveat, 'appropriateness' should be expanded upon in the supporting text to reduce its vagueness. 46 Ryan Bowen (Mr Ryan Bowen) [110] Summary We support the use of financial contributions towards provision of facilities and measures to reduce flooding and protection of water resources. 125 Llandudno Safe Cycling Group (Dr Neil McKenzie) [207] Summary d.Safe and secure cycle parking; People Type We consider this to be essential near all major shopping and service locations in Llandudno e.g. Parc Llandudno, Mostyn Champneys, West Shore beach, hospital,etc 138 Mr J Williams [237] 1 Summary I am satisfied with the LDP as it stands. I write in support of the Green Wedges Policies, and of Policy DP/1 to protect prime agricultural land from development. Change Sought: <strong>Non</strong>e 176 Ms Diane Farmer [425] 1 Object Summary I believe that the proposals to build 100 houses on the farm land at Gloddaeth Isaf contradicts what is said in this part of the Plan i.e.DP/4,2 That planning permission will not be given where there would be unacceptable adverse impact from b) traffic f) on ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character g)flooding and flood risk q) on the best and most versatile agricultural land. Regarding traffic - just visit the two schools at 8.45 a.m., 11.45 and 2.45p.m. to see how busy the road is at present - also, the double and pavement parking along Gloddaeth View! Change Sought: Apply the principles stated in the Plan to the proposals to develop farmland at Gloddeath View, and withdraw these proposals. Designate the fields as a Green Wedge. 452 Chris Wynne (Mr Chris Wynne) [721] Summary Developments should also provide appropriate enhancement to local biodiversity Change Sought: Insert text as above 625 The National Trust (Mr Chris Lambart) [872] 1 Object Summary Although we welcome the inclusion of archaelogical interests and built form within this policy, we are concerned at the omission of other forms of the historic environment from consideraion (although these are addressed in policy CTH/1 and 2). Change Sought: We suggest rewording 2c as "heritage interests and the built form". 652 Rossisle Ltd [833] 1 Object Summary There seems to a trend to require all planning applications to satisfy all criteria. This can be damaging. What is required is a policy that makes it clear that balanced decisions will be taken that balance often subjective issues such as residential amenity against other criteria. There are few if any applications that always satisfy all criteria. You policy ought to reflect this balance. Change Sought: See above 1006 Environment Agency Wales (Mrs Deborah Hemsworth) [1036] 1 Object Summary DP/4 Change Sought: We would suggest that point 2h is reworded to read 'from flooding and flood risk' as the meaning is a little ambiguous at present. Also, we would request that this is reworded to 'on quality and quantity of ground or surface water' to ensure that water resource issues are included. We would suggest that point 2h is reworded to read 'from flooding and flood risk' as the meaning is a little ambiguous at present. Also, we would request that this is reworded to 'on quality and quantity of ground or surface water' to ensure that water resource issues are included. 1501 Community Development Services - Conwy County Borough Council (Mr Robert Dix) [1878] Summary Should DP/4 1i include reference to community facilities? Change Sought: Should DP/4 1i include reference to community facilities? 7237 Welsh Assembly Government (Mr Mark Newey) [2176] 1 Object Summary LDP should move away from reliance on engineering solutions to flooding. TAN 15 should shape policy. BP 17 refers to NPP- the conclusions are currently concerning due to revision of Conwy Tidal FRA and EA Strategic Review is still awaited. Flood risk issues may need to be considered further in respect of employment/housing expansion at Towyn/Kinmel Bay. These allocations introduce uncertainty- could prejudice plan robustness. Reliance on similar 'commitments' without final clearance from EA could undermine delivery given the flexibility associated with low housing growth. If sites are retained, polices DP4/5 should include measures to increase the sites/wider communities resilience flooding. Change Sought: Plan should not be reliant upon engineering solutions to flooding. The plan should wait for the revised studies so a more certain conclusion can be made. <strong>Site</strong>s in Towyn and Kinel Bay should be reviewed and if they are to be kept then polices DP4 and 5 should be changed to increase the resistance of these communities to flood risk. 1 1 1 1 Support Support Support Support Object Object 96
SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES Policy DP/5 Infrastructure and New Developments Rep No Name People Type 48 Ryan Bowen (Mr Ryan Bowen) [110] 1 Support Summary Infrastructure, including water supply and sewerage, are a fundamental pre-requisite of a development proceeding. The importance of utility services for the promotion of new development and their sustainability is referenced in PPW Chapter 12. 1545 Countryside Council for Wales (Mr Richard Ninnes) [1948] 1 Support Summary CCW support the policy and advises that DP/2 that requires contributions to the future maintenance and upkeep of facilities should include "and measures to safeguard or enhance wildlife and habitats". Such measures are promoted by the Plan and will also be necessary mitigation for some developments. The maintenance of such schemes usually incurs ongoing costs. To meet the test of soundness, paragraph 4.26 ought to refer specifically to compliance with other policies in the LDP: " Proposals for development in Conwy will be supported where they comply with other policies in the LDP and where they have made suitable arrangements etc...." 832 Campaign for the Protection of Rural Wales (Mr Richard Waters) [985] Summary Implementation Change Sought: It is noted that infrastructure has to be provided before some sites/areas can be developed. As the successful implementation of the Plan will depend on investment by the utility companies have assurances been received from the companies concerned that this will occur? If so, this should be stated in the plan, but if not, then this should also be clearly indicated together with the associated implications. As the successful implementation of the Plan will depend on investment by the utility companies have assurances been received from the companies concerned that this will occur? If so, this should be stated in the plan, but if not, then this should also be clearly indicated together with the associated implications. 604 Mr John Blakesley [870] 1 Object Summary This policy does not consider the likely impact of the forthcoming Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) or any similar charge Change Sought: Refer to CIL and explain how the Council would deal with this in relation to infrastructure requirements 453 Chris Wynne (Mr Chris Wynne) [721] Summary The policy should also include reference to provision of "green infrastructure" i.e. biodiversity enhancement Change Sought: Insert text as above 1258 Anwyl Construction Ltd (Mr Mike Pender) [1514] 1 Object Summary Policy DP/5 is very open-ended and not specific. It covers a multitude of services some of which are provided by other statutory utilities and public services. No reference is made to what contribution could reasonably be expected from these bodies .Neither a landowner or developer would be able to assess viability of a scheme. See attachment. Change Sought: To make the Plan sound these policies should be deleted or replaces with proper evidence based policies. 1810 Redrow (Mr Robin Buckley) [1996] Summary Redrow object to Policy DP/5 - Infrastructure and New Developments - Paragraph 4.27, for the following reason:- 1.The sentence commencing "Development should not take place" is unnecessary and should be deleted. The following sentence makes it clear that development will only be permitted when an agreed programme of implementation is in place. Change Sought: Redrow object to Policy DP/5 - Infrastructure and New Developments - Paragraph 4.27 7239 1.The sentence commencing "Development should not take place" is unnecessary and should be deleted. Welsh Assembly Government (Mr Mark Newey) [2176] 1 Object Summary Unclear how different components of DP 4 and 5 relate to contributions from new developments regarding appropriate issues and site viability. It is not clear about what evidence is available for water and waste management capacity, if it exists or there is need to improve the system and what impacts this may have on delivery. Change Sought: See full text 1444 Leith Planning Ltd (Mr Chris Plenderleith) [1791] 1 Object Summary It is accepted that the principle of this policy arises from the Community Levy, and the requirement for commuted sum payments for provision of infrastructure is not disputed. However, the payments required should be considered against the development in its entirety and alongside requirements for affordable housing provision. There is a risk with the requirements as laid out in the plan that many schemes will prove to be unviable commercially as a result of these additional costs. This will impact severely on the delivery of development and the long term achievement of the objectives and vision of the Plan. Change Sought: The payments required should be considered against the development in its entirety and alongside requirements for affordable housing provision (the Plan requires 50% AHLN from all developments over a certain size), open space contributions and other financial contributions. There is a risk with the requirements as laid out in the plan that many schemes will prove to be unviable commercially as a result of these additional costs. 1 1 1 Object Object Object 97
Page 1 and 2:
CYNLLUN DATBLYGU LLEOL CONWY I’W
Page 3 and 4:
Policy CTH/3 Buildings and Structur
Page 5 and 6:
LDP - Deposit Plan INTRODUCTION 1.2
Page 7 and 8:
INTRODUCTION 1.5 Rep No Name 1434 L
Page 9 and 10:
INTRODUCTION 1.19 Tests of Soundnes
Page 11 and 12:
INTRODUCTION 1.24 Policy Framework
Page 13 and 14:
INTRODUCTION 1.26 Plan Area context
Page 15 and 16:
INTRODUCTION 1.32 Rep No Name Peopl
Page 17 and 18:
VISION AND OBJECTIVES 2.1 A Vision
Page 19 and 20:
VISION AND OBJECTIVES 2.6 Rep No Na
Page 21 and 22:
VISION AND OBJECTIVES 2.8 Rep No Na
Page 23 and 24:
THE SPATIAL STRATEGY AND KEY DIAGRA
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46: SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND
Page 95: SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING FRAME
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
SECTION ONE - INTRODUCTION 1.2 The
Page 293 and 294:
SECTION ONE - INTRODUCTION 1.3.3 Re
Page 295 and 296:
SECTION ONE - INTRODUCTION 1.8 Coll
Page 297 and 298:
SECTION TWO - VISION AND OBJECTIVES
Page 299 and 300:
SECTION THREE - THE SPATIAL STRATEG
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KE
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
Page 421 and 422:
Page 423 and 424:
Page 425 and 426:
Page 427 and 428:
Page 429 and 430:
Page 431 and 432:
Page 433 and 434:
Page 435 and 436:
Page 437 and 438:
Page 439 and 440:
Page 441 and 442:
SECTION FIVE - IMPLEMENTATION AND M
Page 443 and 444:
Page 445 and 446:
show all

Non Site Allocation Representations Report.pdf

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?