26.03.2013 Views

Non Site Allocation Representations Report.pdf

Non Site Allocation Representations Report.pdf

Non Site Allocation Representations Report.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING FRAMEWORK<br />

5.15<br />

Rep No Name<br />

People Type<br />

1457 Denbighshire County Council - Planning Policy (Martha Savage) [1843]<br />

1 Object<br />

Summary The majority of dwellings delivered within the early years of the LDP will consist of existing commitments and permissions rather than new allocations. In the<br />

latter years of the LDP the new allocations are phased. However, it is unclear how this phasing has been derived.<br />

Change Sought: The majority of dwellings delivered within the early years of the LDP will consist of existing commitments and permissions rather than new allocations. In the<br />

latter years of the LDP the new allocations are phased. However, it is unclear how this phasing has been derived.<br />

1428 Leith Planning Ltd (Mr Chris Plenderleith) [1791]<br />

1 Object<br />

Summary The Council would also appear to be inconsistent in their approach to sites which are privately owned to those in which the Council own or have an interest. In<br />

Table 13 reference is made to several council owned sites which vary from 50% affordable housing through to 100% affordable housing. Ownership of land is<br />

not normally a material planning consideration and there is a concern that the criterion for evaluating Council owned land is different to that applied to privately<br />

owned land; the justification being that the Council will incorporate a greater amount of affordable housing.<br />

Change Sought: There is a concern that this distorts the approach to site selection and requires special and precise justification.<br />

1445 Leith Planning Ltd (Mr Chris Plenderleith) [1791]<br />

1 Object<br />

Summary Having reviewed table 13 in detail, concern is raised that the housing figure outlined in the total has been mis-calculated and should read 7015 units not 7026<br />

This inaccuracy further highlights the concerns regarding the consistency, coherence and soundness of the document in its entirety. The Council should be<br />

required to recalculate the provision proposed in the table and re-publish the document.<br />

Change Sought: The Council should be required to recalculate the provision proposed in the table and re-publish the document.<br />

287

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!