Non Site Allocation Representations Report.pdf

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES Policy STR/5 Integrated Sustainable Transport System Rep No Name People Type 2 Mr Alan Holden [14] 1 Support Summary It's actually Sustrans National Cycle Route 5. I hope you look after/plan it better than the section running through Rhos on Sea to Penrhyn Bay which is poorly designed and maintained (Rhos on Sea to Old Colwyn). 184 Welsh Assembly Government (Mr B Beachell) [455] 1 Support Summary Protected Route - Abergele Bypass The Assembly will wish to be consulted on any proposal which affects Abergele roundabout in order to ensure a satisfactory layout is achieved especially in relation to the A55 westbound off slip road. This may affect the alignment of the proposed route and hence the area which requires protecting. 633 Mr Paul Luckock [146] 1 Support Summary I write in support of the Local Development Plan proposals for Abergele. I support the construction of a by pass road and the construction of additional houses to the west of the town. I judge we need such development to ensure the economic viability of the town and to ensure younger people are encouraged to remain and live and work in North Wales. I am also very relaxed about the construction of a Gypsy Traveller site. I judge that the Council should consult with the Gypsy Traveller community in North Wales to ensure the site is co-created with the residents of Abergele to ensure high quality design and construction to meet Gypsy and Traveller's needs. 1481 Conwy Children and Young People's Partnership (Ms Alwen Sian Williams) [1867] Summary Improve quality of current train station. Improve quality of transport. Improve train stations/bus stops. More reliable bus service to encourage public transport to reduce pollution. 1479 Conwy Children and Young People's Partnership (Ms Alwen Sian Williams) [1867] Summary More walking paths - not just along the prom. 1788 Mostyn Estates Limited (Mr Peter Caldwell) [717] 1 Object Summary Policy STR 5 <strong>Site</strong> Ref. 37/38 Land off Derwen Lane, Penrhyn Bay Change Sought: Council officers have indicated that this site is proposed for a car park to serve parents dropping off and collecting children from the adjoining schools. The site is not proposed for housing. Omit small area of land allocated for housing off Derwen Lane opposite Ysgol Creuddyn and replace with a transport/education allocation. See plan attached 1464 Denbighshire County Council - Planning Policy (Martha Savage) [1843] 1 Object Summary A number of routes contained within the Regional Transport Plan (RTP) are safeguarded within the LDP. To date no routes have been safeguarded within Denbighshire as the RTP has not yet been adopted. It is considered that safeguarding routes could potentially cause planning blight. It is unclear whether the issue of planning blight has been taken into account during the process of formulating the LDP. Change Sought: It is considered that safeguarding routes could potentially cause planning blight. It is unclear whether the issue of planning blight has been taken into account during the process of formulating the LDP. 1420 Sustrans (Mr Glyn Evans) [1770] 1 Object Summary I am happy with the overall coverage that the Plan gives to sustainable transport, but I do not believe that the plan is detailed enough in what it proposes for walking & cycling. The majority of projects that it details are already in the programme and should be complete within the next 5 years, whereas the plan runs until 2022. Walking & Cycling networks should be proposed for all major towns in the county with all new developments contributing to walking & cycling links in the vicinity of the new development. Change Sought: Walking & Cycling networks should be proposed for all major towns in the county with all new developments contributing to walking & cycling links in the vicinity of the new development. 1 1 Support Support 268
SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES 4.258 Minerals and Waste Strategic Statement Rep No Name 484 Chris Wynne (Mr Chris Wynne) [721] Summary There are a number of gaps in this section which we feel need addressing Change Sought: As stated above People Type 335 CEMEX UK Operations Ltd. (Mr Shaun Denny) [636] 1 Object Summary Paragraph 4.258 contradcts itself insofar as it contains an aknowledgement that there may be, in certain circumstances, a need to allocate for mineral extraction and then states that there are no circusmstances in which I could envisage granting planning permission. "unless there are specific technical or environmental circumstances that would justify an allocation. The Council considers that there are no circumstances that would justify an allocation in the Plan Area." In the Company's view the former statement is appropriate, and the latter, contradictory statement severely limits the LDP's flexibility regards mineral working and changing circumstances over the Plan's life. Change Sought: Deletion of the sentence "The Council considers that there are no circumstances that would justify an allocation in the Plan Area." 1759 Mineral Products Association ltd (Mr Andrew Bromley) [2000] 1 Object Summary There is a difference between allocating and safeguarding. Even if at present there is no requirement to allocate sites for hard rock, resources still require safeguarding for future generations. It is essential that all mineral deposits which society may need are safeguarded for possible use by future generations. Change Sought: The final sentence of paragraph 4.258 should be reworded "As well as existing hard rock quarries, resources of hard rock and sand and gravel will be safeguarded". As currently worded the statement is not in line with national policy (MPPW, Para.13) or recommendations in the North Wales RTS (Page 75). 1 Object 269
Page 1 and 2:
CYNLLUN DATBLYGU LLEOL CONWY I’W
Page 3 and 4:
Policy CTH/3 Buildings and Structur
Page 5 and 6:
LDP - Deposit Plan INTRODUCTION 1.2
Page 7 and 8:
INTRODUCTION 1.5 Rep No Name 1434 L
Page 9 and 10:
INTRODUCTION 1.19 Tests of Soundnes
Page 11 and 12:
INTRODUCTION 1.24 Policy Framework
Page 13 and 14:
INTRODUCTION 1.26 Plan Area context
Page 15 and 16:
INTRODUCTION 1.32 Rep No Name Peopl
Page 17 and 18:
VISION AND OBJECTIVES 2.1 A Vision
Page 19 and 20:
VISION AND OBJECTIVES 2.6 Rep No Na
Page 21 and 22:
VISION AND OBJECTIVES 2.8 Rep No Na
Page 23 and 24:
THE SPATIAL STRATEGY AND KEY DIAGRA
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218: SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND
Page 267: SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND
Page 281 and 282: IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING FRAME
Page 291 and 292: SECTION ONE - INTRODUCTION 1.2 The
Page 293 and 294: SECTION ONE - INTRODUCTION 1.3.3 Re
Page 295 and 296: SECTION ONE - INTRODUCTION 1.8 Coll
Page 297 and 298: SECTION TWO - VISION AND OBJECTIVES
Page 299 and 300: SECTION THREE - THE SPATIAL STRATEG
Page 315 and 316: SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KE
Page 317 and 318: SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KE
Page 319 and 320:
SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KE
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
Page 421 and 422:
Page 423 and 424:
Page 425 and 426:
Page 427 and 428:
Page 429 and 430:
Page 431 and 432:
Page 433 and 434:
Page 435 and 436:
Page 437 and 438:
Page 439 and 440:
Page 441 and 442:
SECTION FIVE - IMPLEMENTATION AND M
Page 443 and 444:
Page 445 and 446:
show all

Non Site Allocation Representations Report.pdf

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?