Non Site Allocation Representations Report.pdf

More documents

Recommendations

Info

IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING FRAMEWORK 5.16 Rep No Name People Type 559 Cllr Greg Robbins [601] 1 Support Summary With regard to site 448 Abbey road Llandudno. whilst the development of this land is to be welcomed the high density of housing planned for this site would not be generally in keeping with the area and I would request that this is reduced. I would also request that this site be put to use as an overflow car park for the Town in the period prior to any development taking place as the site is ideal for this use requiring very little work to make it suitable. 5165 Beech Developments (NW) Ltd [765] 1 Object Summary In the first instance, this Table is unsound because it does not appear that the figures add up correctly (Test CE2?). The addition of each of the sub-totals, plus the committed sites, windfall allowances and completions total 6954 and not 7026 as indicated. Change Sought: It is proposed that a site at the junction of Pentywyn Road and Marl lane in Llandudno Junction be allocated as part of this process; the Proposals Map should be amended accordingly. It is noted that the site was in fact identified for residential development in the Draft Llandudno Junction Masterplan prepared on behalf of the Council and WAG. 355 Betws yn Rhos Conservation Society (Mr John Wickins) [630] 1 Object Summary In Table 13, <strong>Site</strong> No. 274 Ffordd y Mynydd/Minafon: shows 5 houses in 2013-14 and another 5 in 2020-2021. This error in the duplication of the number of houses was pointed out to Mr. Stan Yates by telephone earlier this May, who referred the matter to James Harland (Tel. 575180) who was responsible for this table. Our Society requests that the 2013-2014 allocation of 5 houses be removed. Change Sought: Correct table 13 1802 Redrow (Mr Robin Buckley) [1996] Summary Redrow object to the Housing Delivery and Phasing Plan (Table 13) for the following reasons: 1.Land on the south east side of Abergele should be included in the list of allocated sites (refer to attached plan). For justification - see full submission. 2.The Table does not specify site areas, only densities, which makes it impossible to properly assess whether the claimed capacities of allocated sites are realistic having regard to site constraints and open space requirements. 3.The Table includes a figure for existing commitments of 3340 which assumes all sites which currently have planning permission will be built out during the plan period. Clearly that is unlikely to be the case. 4.The Table includes a grossly exaggerated windfall allowance. Hence, larger sites which would ordinarily have been allocated for housing have actually come forward as windfall sites. The LDP will address this issue and therefore the past contribution of windfall sites will not be a realistic guide to future performance. Change Sought: Include land at Abergele south east within the plan for mixed use development. Additionally, all sites need to be re-assessed to determine whether they are likely to deliver completions. A 10% slippage factor should then be applied to the remaining supply to compensate for unknown constraints which might prevent a site coming forward (e.g. ownership constraints, infrastructure problems, viability etc). In addition, the figure of 3340 appears to comprise many small sites (
IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING FRAMEWORK 5.22 Rep No Name 835 Campaign for the Protection of Rural Wales (Mr Richard Waters) [985] Summary Monitoring framework The monitoring framework as set out is inadequate: People Type 1 Object The setting of many targets is being delayed until the first annual monitoring report. By do so will cause an unsatisfactory situation of simultaneously setting targets and monitoring them. Whilst it is accepted that many indicators don't have targets, there does need to be clarity between those indicators have should targets and those that shouldn't. The layout of the indicators / targets is such that they don't match up, thus rendering the tables indecipherable. Change Sought: Monitoring framework The monitoring framework as set out is inadequate: The setting of many targets is being delayed until the first annual monitoring report. By do so will cause an unsatisfactory situation of simultaneously setting targets and monitoring them. Whilst it is accepted that many indicators don't have targets, there does need to be clarity between those indicators have should targets and those that shouldn't. The layout of the indicators / targets is such that they don't match up, thus rendering the tables indecipherable. 289
Page 1 and 2:
CYNLLUN DATBLYGU LLEOL CONWY I’W
Page 3 and 4:
Policy CTH/3 Buildings and Structur
Page 5 and 6:
LDP - Deposit Plan INTRODUCTION 1.2
Page 7 and 8:
INTRODUCTION 1.5 Rep No Name 1434 L
Page 9 and 10:
INTRODUCTION 1.19 Tests of Soundnes
Page 11 and 12:
INTRODUCTION 1.24 Policy Framework
Page 13 and 14:
INTRODUCTION 1.26 Plan Area context
Page 15 and 16:
INTRODUCTION 1.32 Rep No Name Peopl
Page 17 and 18:
VISION AND OBJECTIVES 2.1 A Vision
Page 19 and 20:
VISION AND OBJECTIVES 2.6 Rep No Na
Page 21 and 22:
VISION AND OBJECTIVES 2.8 Rep No Na
Page 23 and 24:
THE SPATIAL STRATEGY AND KEY DIAGRA
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238: SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND
Page 281 and 282: IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING FRAME
Page 287: IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING FRAME
Page 291 and 292: SECTION ONE - INTRODUCTION 1.2 The
Page 293 and 294: SECTION ONE - INTRODUCTION 1.3.3 Re
Page 295 and 296: SECTION ONE - INTRODUCTION 1.8 Coll
Page 297 and 298: SECTION TWO - VISION AND OBJECTIVES
Page 299 and 300: SECTION THREE - THE SPATIAL STRATEG
Page 315 and 316: SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KE
Page 339 and 340:
SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KE
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
Page 421 and 422:
Page 423 and 424:
Page 425 and 426:
Page 427 and 428:
Page 429 and 430:
Page 431 and 432:
Page 433 and 434:
Page 435 and 436:
Page 437 and 438:
Page 439 and 440:
Page 441 and 442:
SECTION FIVE - IMPLEMENTATION AND M
Page 443 and 444:
Page 445 and 446:
show all

Non Site Allocation Representations Report.pdf

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?