5 r. a b a S i a (Tbilisi) bgeraTSesatyvisobis erTi rigisaTvis qarTvelur ...

c) it disappears with certain verbs (ial-v-is>imal-eba, ixat-v-is > ixat-eba...)
d) in some cases it merges with some other formants of the Present-tense
steam (ikl-veb-a > ikvleba, ixn-veb-a > ixvneba...)
e) in some cases it merged with the steam and forms a new suffix (cur-avobs,
gor-av-obs)
All the mentioned events have a common ground: the distribution of the
Present-tense forming suffixes is based on the category of voice; we have spoken
about this fact earlier as well (G. Gogolashvili, Thematic Marker and the Category
of Voice, 1998). To be more concrete the suffix –av is preserved or turns
up in the verbs of Active Voice (and Medial-Active); it gets lost or merges with
a new suffix in the Passive Voice; it merges with the steam and forms a new
suffix in verbs of Medial Voce.
All these obeys the regularity which reveals the tendency of shifting thematic
marker in Georgian.
q. g o C i t a S v i l i, g. S a b a S v i l i (Tbilisi)
qalaquri metyvelebis genderuli diferenciacia
uaxles samecniero kvlevebSi qalaquri metyveleba ganixileba
ara mxolod rogorc lingvisturi, aramed rogorc
lingvokulturologiuri fenomeni.
termini `qalaquri metyveleba~, romelsac ukve aqvs garkveuli
tradiciebi, zustad sazRvravs sakvlev obieqts,
Tumca Teoriuli TvalsazrisiT ar aris mkacrad SemosazRvruli.
SeiZleba iTqvas, rom qarTul samecniero literatura-
Si jerjerobiT ar aris saTanadod Seswavlili erovnuli
enis, enobrivi sistemebisa da qvesistemebis maxasiaTebelTa
erToblioba; ar aris garkveuli ama Tu im enobrivi koleqtivis,
maT Soris qalaqis macxovreblebis sametyvelo Taviseburebebi.
134