5 r. a b a S i a (Tbilisi) bgeraTSesatyvisobis erTi rigisaTvis qarTvelur ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2. The peculiarities of addressing etiquette are as follows: a) The honorific forms are linguistically marked. The varieties of II personal pronouns are different according to the social status, rank, age, gender or caste (Geiger 1938; Disanayaka 1998; Apkhaidze 2005). b) Strangers do not usually use II personal honorific forms for addressing but marked words according to gender: nona “lady” and mahattayia “gentleman” which requires the dative construction of the subject. Therefore the question "what would you like?" in Sinhalese acquires the special shade as if it is meant the 3 rd number person; for example: mahattəyətə monəvədə ōnǃ? _ literally means: "What does the gentlemen want?” For the addressing of Buddhist monk the special II personal noun obəvəhansē < obə+ vahan + sē honorific you + sandals, shoes + manner (Geiger: 1938) is used. c) The usage of proper nouns for addressing three main categories of relatives is prohibited, for example between wives and husbands, between parents and children and between siblings. d) The kinship terms denoting grandparents, uncles, aunts and siblings acquire the nuance of politeness by adding the proper nouns. For example: dinēa ayiya = “Dinesha elder brother”; pihita siya = “Pihita grandfather”, premila akka= “Premila elder sister”, etc. 3) There are many varieties of honorific suffixes in literary Sinhala which can be added to the nouns, pronouns and verbs, as well. When the S is marked by special honorific suffix , an adequate honorific one is generally affixed to its predicate.This practice is more regularly followed in Classics than in modern writings(Gunasekera1891). The problem we discuss in our paper is noteworthy not only for Sinhala language but also, in our opinion, it is important to be studied in the Kartvelian languages as well. The separate ethnographic, genetic, socio-linguistic questions for Georgian are studied by Georgian researchers but not completely. Obviously , it is not only the linguistic problem but also it is the subject of linguistic study due to the linguistic marking of this fact. If we want to study interrelation of the socio-cultural and language behavior norms , then it is necessary to study the specifics of the particular languages from this viewpoint. The object of our study has become Sinhala as comparatively with Georgian it 58
is the most different language from the viewpoint of typological study available for us on this stage. We believe, that it will be possible to find out many typological similarities between them because both societies (Sinhalese and Georgian) have many common from the viewpoint of novelty or antiquity during language expressing of socio-cultural behaviors. It is a subject for our future studies. r. a s a T i a n i (<strong>Tbilisi</strong>) ergatiuli konstruqciis morfosintaqsuri modelebis tipologia qarTulsa da bacburSi zogadi tipologiis mixedviT qarTuli ganisazRvreba semantikuri rolebisa da deiqsisebis formalizaciaze orientirebul enad. imave tipologiis safuZvelze, bacburi (anu wova-TuSuri, rogorc Tavad es xalxi uwodebs TavisTavs) msgavsadve kvalificirdeba. SemoTavazebuli Teoriuli midgomis Tanaxmad, enaTa amomwuravi tipologiisaTvis mizanSewonili da efeqturia enaTa klasifikaciisaTvis Rirebul niSnebs Soris ierarqiuli mimarTebebis garkveva. ierarqiebi dgindeba enobriv struqturebSi sxvadasxvagvar kategoriaTa asaxvis gansxvavebuli prioritetulobiT. isini asaxaven ena- Si mimdinare rTul sinqroniulsa Tu diaqroniul procesebs. aseTi midgomiT, miuxedavad imisa, rom orive ganxiluli ena ergatiul konstruqciebs semantikuri rolebisa da pir- Ta I/II : III diqotomiis mixedviT gansazRvravs, am konstruqciebis ganmapirobebel kategoriebs Soris dadgenili ierarqiebi gansxvavebulia: kontaqtebis safuZvelze bacburSi ganviTarebul sistemaSi upiratesoba eniWeba semantikur rolTa markirebas, maSin rodesac qarTulSi pirTa diqotomiis markirebaa ierarqiulad ufro Zlieri. SeiZleba iTqvas, rom bacburSi enobrivi inteferenciis Sedegad warmoqmnili ‘axa- 59
Page 1 and 2:
. a b a S i a (Tbilisi) bgeraTSesat
Page 3 and 4: We can assume that in the equivalen
Page 5 and 6: ha - qa «клятва», hobol - q
Page 7 and 8: Формы перфектной с
Page 9 and 10: formation (immediate or immediate i
Page 11 and 12: В функционально-гр
Page 13 and 14: деепричастия совер
Page 15 and 16: sual types of subordinate clauses a
Page 17 and 18: поскольку оно напр
Page 19 and 20: гоязычия в Дагеста
Page 21 and 22: M . A g l a r o v (Makhachkala) A P
Page 23 and 24: Б . А т а е в (Махачка
Page 25 and 26: Н. А л ь б е к о в (Гро
Page 27 and 28: culture of the nation. But it doesn
Page 29 and 30: “теплый” - баба-гь-
Page 31 and 32: language and had lost its popular b
Page 33 and 34: nisa da RvTaebrivi enisa. dabal fen
Page 35 and 36: is saxeluri fuZeebi, romelTa zmnuri
Page 37 and 38: Tuki naxur enaTa am monacemebs erTi
Page 39 and 40: In the respect of the difficult his
Page 41 and 42: n. a r d o t e l i (Tbilisi) zmnur
Page 43 and 44: ve the following morphological stru
Page 45 and 46: S. A s l a n o v a, Z. E f e n d i
Page 47 and 48: 2. analizis sagania atributul sinta
Page 49 and 50: Seadgenen qveynis mosaxleobis 81.9%
Page 51 and 52: “fexsacmeli”. Sdr.: pali: upāh
Page 53: We will discuss those peculiarities
Page 57 and 58: М . Б а г о м е д о в (М
Page 59 and 60: На исчезновение то
Page 61 and 62: XX saukunis ocian wlebSi sabWoTa xe
Page 63 and 64: language on all territory of Russia
Page 65 and 66: гьамиша ‘всегда, п
Page 67 and 68: hand, and in keeping the non-adapte
Page 69 and 70: В даргинском языке
Page 71 and 72: The Future Indicative Tense in Darg
Page 73 and 74: языка воспринимают
Page 75 and 76: Compound verbs, syntactical matrix
Page 77 and 78: zRvruls, osurSi aqac gansxvavebuli
Page 79 and 80: 3. Determinant is expressed by adje
Page 81 and 82: TavisTavad am kiTxvas ar eqneboda r
Page 83 and 84: turebamde. es gza unda gadiodes Cve
Page 85 and 86: анлаутных гласных.
Page 87 and 88: “kuTvnilebis” cnebaTa Serwyma d
Page 89 and 90: se into a static present or to be u
Page 91 and 92: Б.Ч. Б и ж о е в (Наль
Page 93 and 94: Деепричастная синт
Page 95 and 96: units. However, Kartvelian offers s
Page 97 and 98: 3. Zval-i “Zvali” : a-zur “id
Page 99 and 100: Basque and Kartvelian languages, am
Page 101 and 102: tis Sefasebas gvawvdis. sityvaSi so
Page 103 and 104: guists attempt to reach in the esse
Page 105 and 106:
Tavs umlautis gareSe. zog TqmaSi am
Page 107 and 108:
quantitatively and qualitatively. T
Page 109 and 110:
З . И . Г а й д а р о в
Page 111 and 112:
указание на то, что
Page 113 and 114:
It goes without saying that very cl
Page 115 and 116:
In Lezgfian language they say «yex
Page 117 and 118:
заслуживающие снис
Page 119 and 120:
There is an opinion on necessity of
Page 121 and 122:
«концы ножниц»; миц
Page 123 and 124:
ad ekuTvnis awmyos wresac da myofad
Page 125 and 126:
omonimur gagebas Seicavs zogjer orp
Page 127 and 128:
Some verbs of the middle voice can
Page 129 and 130:
g. g o g o l a S v i l i (Tbilisi)
Page 131 and 132:
qalaquri metyvelebis mravalferovneb
Page 133 and 134:
Catarebuli kvlevis safuZvelze SeiZl
Page 135 and 136:
tivirebulobas gansazRvraven. enaSi
Page 137 and 138:
mono-semousness. Special importance
Page 139 and 140:
Название некоторых
Page 141 and 142:
I. D i b i r o v, Kh. I b r a g i m
Page 143 and 144:
girdibil «a cross-section saw»,
Page 145 and 146:
The list of classification of langu
Page 147 and 148:
goriaTa morfologiuri modelebis urTi
Page 149 and 150:
magram mniSvnelobas inarCunebs geg
Page 151 and 152:
iantis audio-Cawera am Targmanis mi
Page 153 and 154:
able to record on audiotape a few T
Page 155 and 156:
сердер ‘наместник
Page 157 and 158:
In comparison with the archaic word
Page 159 and 160:
‘оплодотворение, п
Page 161 and 162:
‘шерстистый, длинн
Page 163 and 164:
*stur ‘strong, hard, stalwart’.
Page 165:
The Northwest Caucasian languages t
show all

5 r. a b a S i a (Tbilisi) bgeraTSesatyvisobis erTi rigisaTvis qarTvelur ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?