5 r. a b a S i a (Tbilisi) bgeraTSesatyvisobis erTi rigisaTvis qarTvelur ...

v. b o e d e r i (oldenburgi)
sintaqsisa da morfologiis Seusabamobis
Teoriuli problemebi qarTvelur enebSi
tradiciul gramatikaSi enobrivi struqturuli doneebis
erTmaneTSi kanonzomieri asaxva aucilebel pirobad gvevlineba.
kerZod, garkveuli morfologiuri kategoriebi da Semadgenlebi
gansazRvrul, mkacr mimarTebaSia sintaqsur erTeulebTan.
qarTvelur enebSi ki xandaxan vxvdebiT kargad nacnob,
magram aqamde jerovnad Seufasebel zogierT Seusabamobas
sintaqsur da morfologiur erTeulebs Soris, magaliTad:
1) bavSvebs Cais dagisxamT, ufrosebi ki Rvinos davlevT.
2) samTagan erTi SeuvalT, sxva gareT vscemdeT garebsa
(rusTaveli 1405, 2; akademiis komentari: “samTagan erT-erTi
SevaRwevT, sxvebi gareT vebrZoloT gareT myofebs”)
3) Savo mayvaliviT Tvalebiano (saiaTnova)
4) f‘ri jˆjvi lˆtr gC (a. oniani, svanuri)
1) da 2) aris SeuTanxmeblobis magaliTebi, 3)-sa da 4)-Si
ki sityvaTwarmoeba sityvis sazRvrebs ugulebelhyofs. amgvari
SemTxvevebi gvafiqrebinebs morfologiasa da sintaqss
Soris erTgvari Sexebis wertilis arsebobas, romelic miRebuli
wesebisgan gansxvavdeba. moxsenebaSi amgvari monacemebis
ganxilvidan miRebul SesaZlo Teoriul daskvnebze iqneba
msjeloba.
W. B o e d e r (Oldenburg)
Problems of Mismatch Between Syntax and
Morphology in Kartvelian
Traditional grammar normally presupposes a straightforward mapping relation
between linguistic levels. In particular, morphological categories and constituents
are considered to either correspond to, or be triggered by, syntactic
98