5 r. a b a S i a (Tbilisi) bgeraTSesatyvisobis erTi rigisaTvis qarTvelur ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Xersig ‘sucking-pig’ (Ing. xursk). Formed with diminutive suff. -ig from h’ars- // *ph’ars- ‘fair’, related to PIE *perk- ‘motley, spotty’, *pork'o ‘pig, swine’ (Lat. роrcus, Lith. paršas ‘hog’, Slav. *porsen ‘sucking-pig’). H’iex 1 ‘Caucasian goat’ (dial. h’iek, Ing h’agh, Bats h’ax, pl. h’axar). From *h’ax (< *h’ak // *ph’ak), wich related to PIE *p h ek u - ‘cattle’, Iran. *pak ‘small cattle; sheep, ram’ (Avest. pasu- ‘cattle’, Khotan-sak. pasa ‘sheep’, Pekhl. pah, Kurd pas, pes, Afg. psэ ‘sheep’, Osset. fys ‘sheep’). Esa ‘calf’ (Ing. ‘asa, Bats as). Proto-Nakh *as // *asi ‘calf, stirk’ probably related to E ass, ME asse ‘donkey’. Also cf.: Dag. *b-as- ‘calf’ (Avar beče < *b-ese, Akhvakh buša < *b-usa, Bezt. biše < *bise), where b- is a gender mark. K. W a m l i n g (Malmoe) Agreement in Circassian Pentavalent Verbs The general frame of this paper is the interest in the range of variation in human languages, and in this particular case, the range of variation in verbal agreement. William Croft, the prominent typologist and disciple of J. Greenberg, maintains that ”the maximum of indexed arguments is four: A, T, G and either a benefactive […] or a causer in a causative construction” (Croft 2003). He refers to the Bantu language, Kinyarwanda and North Caucasian Abaza. This point is further developed in the paper and it is noted that the system of subject and object agreement in the Circassian languages is even richer. The prefixal slots for person and number markers of the Circassian verb amount to a maximum of five (Kumakhov & Vamling 2006). This is found, for instance, in derived verbs resulting from causative, comitative and/or benefactive derivation. Although ø-marking is common in the agreement system, a pentavalent verb may include five overt agreement markers, as in (1) below. 168
The Northwest Caucasian languages thus present a challenge to the assumed limits on variation in verbal agreement. k. v a m l i n g i (malme) SeTanxmeba Cerqezul xuTvalentian zmnebSi ZiriTadi arsi am statiisa aris daintereseba enaSi variantebis sferoTi da am gansakuTrebul SemTxvevaSi _ saxesxvaobebiT zmnur SeTanxmebaSi. uiliam krofti, gamoCenili tipologisti da j. grinbergis moswavle, amtkicebs, rom indeqsirebul argumentTa maqsimumi oTxia: A, T, C da benefaqtivi an mizezi kauzatiur konstruqciaSi (krofti 2003). igi ganixilavs bantus enas, kiniarvandas da Cr. kavkasiur abazurs. statiaSi es Tvalsazrisi ufro Rrmad aris ganviTarebuli da aRniSnulia, rom Cerqezul enebSi subieqtisa da obieqtis SeTanxmebis sistema ufro mdidaric ki aris. prefiqsuli Wrili Cerqezuli zmnis pirisa da ricxvis niSnebisTvis Seadgens maqsimum xuTs (kumaxovi da vamlingi 2006). es, magaliTad, SeimCneva kauzaturi, komitaturi da / an benefaqtiuri derivaciis Sedegad miRebul zmnebSi. miuxedavad imisa, rom Ø _ niSani saerToa SeTanxmebis sistemaSi, xuTvalentiani zmna SesaZlebelia Seicavdes xuT aSkara SeTanxmebis niSans, rogorc es mocemulia qvemoT (1). `me vaiZule igi migeca misTvis maTi gulisTvis~ amdenad, Crd.-das. kavkasiuri enebis magaliTi moiTxovs zmnuri SeTanxmebis dRemde arsebuli normis gadasinjvas. 169
Page 1 and 2:
. a b a S i a (Tbilisi) bgeraTSesat
Page 3 and 4:
We can assume that in the equivalen
Page 5 and 6:
ha - qa «клятва», hobol - q
Page 7 and 8:
Формы перфектной с
Page 9 and 10:
formation (immediate or immediate i
Page 11 and 12:
В функционально-гр
Page 13 and 14:
деепричастия совер
Page 15 and 16:
sual types of subordinate clauses a
Page 17 and 18:
поскольку оно напр
Page 19 and 20:
гоязычия в Дагеста
Page 21 and 22:
M . A g l a r o v (Makhachkala) A P
Page 23 and 24:
Б . А т а е в (Махачка
Page 25 and 26:
Н. А л ь б е к о в (Гро
Page 27 and 28:
culture of the nation. But it doesn
Page 29 and 30:
“теплый” - баба-гь-
Page 31 and 32:
language and had lost its popular b
Page 33 and 34:
nisa da RvTaebrivi enisa. dabal fen
Page 35 and 36:
is saxeluri fuZeebi, romelTa zmnuri
Page 37 and 38:
Tuki naxur enaTa am monacemebs erTi
Page 39 and 40:
In the respect of the difficult his
Page 41 and 42:
n. a r d o t e l i (Tbilisi) zmnur
Page 43 and 44:
ve the following morphological stru
Page 45 and 46:
S. A s l a n o v a, Z. E f e n d i
Page 47 and 48:
2. analizis sagania atributul sinta
Page 49 and 50:
Seadgenen qveynis mosaxleobis 81.9%
Page 51 and 52:
“fexsacmeli”. Sdr.: pali: upāh
Page 53 and 54:
We will discuss those peculiarities
Page 55 and 56:
is the most different language from
Page 57 and 58:
М . Б а г о м е д о в (М
Page 59 and 60:
На исчезновение то
Page 61 and 62:
XX saukunis ocian wlebSi sabWoTa xe
Page 63 and 64:
language on all territory of Russia
Page 65 and 66:
гьамиша ‘всегда, п
Page 67 and 68:
hand, and in keeping the non-adapte
Page 69 and 70:
В даргинском языке
Page 71 and 72:
The Future Indicative Tense in Darg
Page 73 and 74:
языка воспринимают
Page 75 and 76:
Compound verbs, syntactical matrix
Page 77 and 78:
zRvruls, osurSi aqac gansxvavebuli
Page 79 and 80:
3. Determinant is expressed by adje
Page 81 and 82:
TavisTavad am kiTxvas ar eqneboda r
Page 83 and 84:
turebamde. es gza unda gadiodes Cve
Page 85 and 86:
анлаутных гласных.
Page 87 and 88:
“kuTvnilebis” cnebaTa Serwyma d
Page 89 and 90:
se into a static present or to be u
Page 91 and 92:
Б.Ч. Б и ж о е в (Наль
Page 93 and 94:
Деепричастная синт
Page 95 and 96:
units. However, Kartvelian offers s
Page 97 and 98:
3. Zval-i “Zvali” : a-zur “id
Page 99 and 100:
Basque and Kartvelian languages, am
Page 101 and 102:
tis Sefasebas gvawvdis. sityvaSi so
Page 103 and 104:
guists attempt to reach in the esse
Page 105 and 106:
Tavs umlautis gareSe. zog TqmaSi am
Page 107 and 108:
quantitatively and qualitatively. T
Page 109 and 110:
З . И . Г а й д а р о в
Page 111 and 112:
указание на то, что
Page 113 and 114: It goes without saying that very cl
Page 115 and 116: In Lezgfian language they say «yex
Page 117 and 118: заслуживающие снис
Page 119 and 120: There is an opinion on necessity of
Page 121 and 122: «концы ножниц»; миц
Page 123 and 124: ad ekuTvnis awmyos wresac da myofad
Page 125 and 126: omonimur gagebas Seicavs zogjer orp
Page 127 and 128: Some verbs of the middle voice can
Page 129 and 130: g. g o g o l a S v i l i (Tbilisi)
Page 131 and 132: qalaquri metyvelebis mravalferovneb
Page 133 and 134: Catarebuli kvlevis safuZvelze SeiZl
Page 135 and 136: tivirebulobas gansazRvraven. enaSi
Page 137 and 138: mono-semousness. Special importance
Page 139 and 140: Название некоторых
Page 141 and 142: I. D i b i r o v, Kh. I b r a g i m
Page 143 and 144: girdibil «a cross-section saw»,
Page 145 and 146: The list of classification of langu
Page 147 and 148: goriaTa morfologiuri modelebis urTi
Page 149 and 150: magram mniSvnelobas inarCunebs geg
Page 151 and 152: iantis audio-Cawera am Targmanis mi
Page 153 and 154: able to record on audiotape a few T
Page 155 and 156: сердер ‘наместник
Page 157 and 158: In comparison with the archaic word
Page 159 and 160: ‘оплодотворение, п
Page 161 and 162: ‘шерстистый, длинн
Page 163: *stur ‘strong, hard, stalwart’.
show all

5 r. a b a S i a (Tbilisi) bgeraTSesatyvisobis erTi rigisaTvis qarTvelur ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?