5 r. a b a S i a (Tbilisi) bgeraTSesatyvisobis erTi rigisaTvis qarTvelur ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

L. E z u g b a i a (<strong>Tbilisi</strong>) Towards the Relation of a Preverb and Connective Categories According to connective categories (causative, version, voice) during structuring a verb conjugate paradigm, taking into account a preverb – as the semantics of poly-functional morpheme is essential. Similarly to Georgian, in Megrelian-Laz a preverb plays a great role in constructing of conjugate paradigm. In Zan a number and a semantics of preverbs is more different then in Georgian, accordingly, this peculiarity is reflected in the process of conjugation. In the paper we analyse the Megrelian material, though we will bring the parallels from Laz. We also analyse the interrelation of a preverb and morphological models of connective categories from structural and semantic viewpoint, as well. It is noteworthy, that in Zan a preverb has the same functions (direction, orientation, aspect, tense) as in Georgian, but semantically it has a wider spectrum: it is also a typological feature. Though in connection with this or that lexical stem and morphological form it has a role of a word-forming morpheme. In Megrelian a preverb became such morpheme, which expresses not only the attributive categories, but it defines the semantics of interrelation among persons just according to connective categories. r. e n o x i (ruben enuqaSvili) (ierusalimi) qarTvel ebraelTa Soris arsebuli tradiciuli zepiri Targmani “Sesaqmis” wignisa da misi mniSvneloba qarTuli enis istoriis Sesaswavlad qarTvel ebraelTa Soris saukuneebis ganmavlobaSi arsebobda da zepiri gziT Taobidan Taobas gadaecemoda Zveli aRTqmis tradiciuli Targmani – “Tavsilis” saxelwodebiT. ukanasknel dromde igi TiTqmis ar iyo cnobili samecniero sazogadoebisaTvis da arc Seswavlis sagani gamxdara. Cven SevZeliT gangvexorcielebina Sesaqmis wignis ramdenime va- 154
iantis audio-Cawera am Targmanis mixedviT da kritikuli aparatiT gamarTuli teqsti uaxloes xanebSi gamoqveyndeba (albaT, ukve xelT gveqneba konferenciis Catarebis droisa- Tvis). teqsti mTlianad aris Cawerili <strong>erTi</strong> rabinisagan, xolo datebiT Cawerilia fragmentebi kidev ori rabinisagan. “Tavsils” udidesi mniSvneloba aqvs rogorc zogadkulturuli TvalsazrisiT – Zveli aRTqmis Targmanebis (gansakuTrebiT, zepiri Targmanebis) zogadi problemebis Sesaswavlad, ise qarTuli saliteraturo enis istoriisa da dialeqtologiis sakiTxebis kvlevisaTvis. Cveni dakvirvebiT, Targmani me-11-me-12 saukuneebSi unda iyos Seqmnili. rogorc aRiniSna, igi Taobidan Taobas gadaecemoda zepiri gziT da dRemde Semoinaxa (Tumc ki dRes aSkaraa misi dakargvis safrTxe), bevrwilad tradiciuli saxiT. ebrauli sarwmunoebis msaxurni wlobiT specialurad swavlobdnen teqsts da cdilobdnen SeenarCunebinaT igi winaprebisagan miRebuli formiT, magram, bunebrivia, absoluturi sizustiT teqstis gadacema ver xerxdeboda, rasac mravali mizezi ganapirobebda: upirveles yovlisa, TviT rabinebis mexsierebiTi unari da zogadi ganaTlebis done (vgulisxmobT saliteraturo enasTan kavSirs), aseve cocxal sametyvelo enaSi mimdinare cvlilebani, adgilobrivi dialeqtis gavlena, ivriTis (ebrauli enis) codnis “doza” da, Sesabamisad, originalis gavlena da a. S. ueWvelia “Tavsilis” udidesi mniSvneloba qarTuli enaTmecnierebisaTvis. es xom istoriuli cocxali metyvelebis uiSviaTesi dokumentia, romlis saTanadod Seswavlac dagvexmareba enis istoriisa da istoriuli dialeqtologiis rigi (iqneb, kardinaluri) sakiTxis garkvevaSi. moxsenebaSi warmodgenili iqneba nimuSebi imisa, Tu rogor SeiZleba “Tavsilis” mixedviT Tvali gavadevnoT qar- Tul enaSi mimdinare cvlilebebs. ramdenime nimuSi: 1. nawevari. “Tavsili” nawevars xmarobs SeuzRudavad. naTelia, rom es ivriTis gavlenis Sedegia, magram, meore mxriv, isic udavoa, rom Targmanis Seqmnis Jams nawevari aq- 155
Page 1 and 2:
. a b a S i a (Tbilisi) bgeraTSesat
Page 3 and 4:
We can assume that in the equivalen
Page 5 and 6:
ha - qa «клятва», hobol - q
Page 7 and 8:
Формы перфектной с
Page 9 and 10:
formation (immediate or immediate i
Page 11 and 12:
В функционально-гр
Page 13 and 14:
деепричастия совер
Page 15 and 16:
sual types of subordinate clauses a
Page 17 and 18:
поскольку оно напр
Page 19 and 20:
гоязычия в Дагеста
Page 21 and 22:
M . A g l a r o v (Makhachkala) A P
Page 23 and 24:
Б . А т а е в (Махачка
Page 25 and 26:
Н. А л ь б е к о в (Гро
Page 27 and 28:
culture of the nation. But it doesn
Page 29 and 30:
“теплый” - баба-гь-
Page 31 and 32:
language and had lost its popular b
Page 33 and 34:
nisa da RvTaebrivi enisa. dabal fen
Page 35 and 36:
is saxeluri fuZeebi, romelTa zmnuri
Page 37 and 38:
Tuki naxur enaTa am monacemebs erTi
Page 39 and 40:
In the respect of the difficult his
Page 41 and 42:
n. a r d o t e l i (Tbilisi) zmnur
Page 43 and 44:
ve the following morphological stru
Page 45 and 46:
S. A s l a n o v a, Z. E f e n d i
Page 47 and 48:
2. analizis sagania atributul sinta
Page 49 and 50:
Seadgenen qveynis mosaxleobis 81.9%
Page 51 and 52:
“fexsacmeli”. Sdr.: pali: upāh
Page 53 and 54:
We will discuss those peculiarities
Page 55 and 56:
is the most different language from
Page 57 and 58:
М . Б а г о м е д о в (М
Page 59 and 60:
На исчезновение то
Page 61 and 62:
XX saukunis ocian wlebSi sabWoTa xe
Page 63 and 64:
language on all territory of Russia
Page 65 and 66:
гьамиша ‘всегда, п
Page 67 and 68:
hand, and in keeping the non-adapte
Page 69 and 70:
В даргинском языке
Page 71 and 72:
The Future Indicative Tense in Darg
Page 73 and 74:
языка воспринимают
Page 75 and 76:
Compound verbs, syntactical matrix
Page 77 and 78:
zRvruls, osurSi aqac gansxvavebuli
Page 79 and 80:
3. Determinant is expressed by adje
Page 81 and 82:
TavisTavad am kiTxvas ar eqneboda r
Page 83 and 84:
turebamde. es gza unda gadiodes Cve
Page 85 and 86:
анлаутных гласных.
Page 87 and 88:
“kuTvnilebis” cnebaTa Serwyma d
Page 89 and 90:
se into a static present or to be u
Page 91 and 92:
Б.Ч. Б и ж о е в (Наль
Page 93 and 94:
Деепричастная синт
Page 95 and 96:
units. However, Kartvelian offers s
Page 97 and 98:
3. Zval-i “Zvali” : a-zur “id
Page 99 and 100: Basque and Kartvelian languages, am
Page 101 and 102: tis Sefasebas gvawvdis. sityvaSi so
Page 103 and 104: guists attempt to reach in the esse
Page 105 and 106: Tavs umlautis gareSe. zog TqmaSi am
Page 107 and 108: quantitatively and qualitatively. T
Page 109 and 110: З . И . Г а й д а р о в
Page 111 and 112: указание на то, что
Page 113 and 114: It goes without saying that very cl
Page 115 and 116: In Lezgfian language they say «yex
Page 117 and 118: заслуживающие снис
Page 119 and 120: There is an opinion on necessity of
Page 121 and 122: «концы ножниц»; миц
Page 123 and 124: ad ekuTvnis awmyos wresac da myofad
Page 125 and 126: omonimur gagebas Seicavs zogjer orp
Page 127 and 128: Some verbs of the middle voice can
Page 129 and 130: g. g o g o l a S v i l i (Tbilisi)
Page 131 and 132: qalaquri metyvelebis mravalferovneb
Page 133 and 134: Catarebuli kvlevis safuZvelze SeiZl
Page 135 and 136: tivirebulobas gansazRvraven. enaSi
Page 137 and 138: mono-semousness. Special importance
Page 139 and 140: Название некоторых
Page 141 and 142: I. D i b i r o v, Kh. I b r a g i m
Page 143 and 144: girdibil «a cross-section saw»,
Page 145 and 146: The list of classification of langu
Page 147 and 148: goriaTa morfologiuri modelebis urTi
Page 149: magram mniSvnelobas inarCunebs geg
Page 153 and 154: able to record on audiotape a few T
Page 155 and 156: сердер ‘наместник
Page 157 and 158: In comparison with the archaic word
Page 159 and 160: ‘оплодотворение, п
Page 161 and 162: ‘шерстистый, длинн
Page 163 and 164: *stur ‘strong, hard, stalwart’.
Page 165: The Northwest Caucasian languages t
show all

5 r. a b a S i a (Tbilisi) bgeraTSesatyvisobis erTi rigisaTvis qarTvelur ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?