5 r. a b a S i a (Tbilisi) bgeraTSesatyvisobis erTi rigisaTvis qarTvelur ...

One peculiarity of syntactic connection must be also mentioned in Ossetian.
In the Ossetian language there is no clear distinction between agreement,
government and adjunction. (Some researchers consider that Cemi wigni is
government, others think it is an example of adjunction. Some researchers
consider that meore saxli is adjunction others do not think so).
Syntactic dependence of word combinations in a sentence is considered
differently in Georgian and Ossetian. What is well-expressed example of
agreement in Georgian, in Ossetian is represented as an appropriate example of
adjunction. The same difference is in cases of government and adjunction. As
it is in Georgian, there is no clear division between government and adjunction
in Ossetian. A word with full meaning (in the given case fixed form, in other
case form changing) is considered as form changing in general, and syntactic
pair is transferred in the plane of adjunction.
In our opinion, syntactic pairs which consist of name (fixed declination of
name) and conjugated name (when determinant advances the definer) there
must be marked as government (in some cases the name can be government –
agreement and not adjunction). Зёронд Сёхмёт йё хёдзары къуымёй
никуыдём ацыдис 7.175 (An old Saxmat has not gone anywhere from his
house). Syntactic pair Зёронд Сёхмёт (an old Saxmat); Дуры хадзёр (stone
house) and similar pairs must be considered as a case of government (and not
adjunction).
a. b e r T l a n i (Telavi)
xmovanTa xasiaTisa da genezisis zogadfonetikuri
sakiTxebi wova-TuSuris masalis mixedviT
samecniero wyaroebSi, SemarTvis TvalsazrisiT, xmovnebi
daxasiaTebulia xolme zogadad, ukeTes SemTxvevaSi, Tavkidur
poziciaSi (anlautSi). magram iSviaTad Tu aris dakonkretebuli
is, Tu rogoria isini inlautSi an auslaut-
Si?
84