11.07.2015 Views

An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century - California Ocean ...

An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century - California Ocean ...

An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century - California Ocean ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

local, and municipal governments, watershed groups, academia, and <strong>the</strong> private sector.The Council serves as <strong>the</strong> major national <strong>for</strong>um <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> coordination of consistent andscientifically defensible federal and state water quality monitoring methods and strategies.Its focus has been on fresh water monitoring, but many of <strong>the</strong> methods it has developedcould also be applied to marine environments.The National Science and Technology Council’s Committee on Environment andNatural Resources has also promoted an initiative to integrate and coordinate environmentalmonitoring ef<strong>for</strong>ts. From this initiative came <strong>the</strong> 1997 report, Integrating <strong>the</strong>Nation’s Environmental Monitoring and Research Networks and Programs: A ProposedFramework. The framework is designed to produce <strong>the</strong> necessary scientific data andin<strong>for</strong>mation to produce integrated environmental assessments.The Coastal Research and Monitoring Strategy Workgroup was <strong>for</strong>med in 1999 withrepresentatives from federal, state, tribal, and nongovernmental organizations. NOAA,EPA, USGS, and USDA led <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>the</strong> Workgroup’s Coastal Research andMonitoring Strategy, published in 2000, which called <strong>for</strong> addressing problems of coastalwater quality and coastal resources by replacing single-issue, single-agency, single-disciplineproblem solving with a coordinated, multi-agency, interdisciplinary approach.While <strong>the</strong>se interagency initiatives are moving in <strong>the</strong> right direction, <strong>the</strong>y have notresulted in <strong>the</strong> comprehensive and coordinated national monitoring network resourcemanagers need, particularly in coastal areas. Significant obstacles include a lack of: focuson <strong>the</strong> coast; participation by agencies with relevant responsibilities; follow-through; andcommitment at <strong>the</strong> highest levels of government.Ensuring Comprehensive, Coordinated CoverageThe nation’s coastal margin is <strong>the</strong> most densely populated and developed region of <strong>the</strong>nation, and its waters have been significantly degraded by pollution. Yet, in recent years,due largely to lack of funding, monitoring has been extremely sparse along <strong>the</strong> coasts.Much remains unknown about <strong>the</strong> status of coastal environments, and increased monitoringwill be required to make in<strong>for</strong>med management decisions about this economically andecologically valuable region. A long-term, comprehensive monitoring network can establisha baseline to facilitate <strong>the</strong> analysis of ecosystem change. It would also create an in<strong>for</strong>mationbase to allow managers to understand whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>ir strategies were effective inmeeting <strong>the</strong>ir goals. While expanded monitoring will be needed, it will also be importantto disseminate and use <strong>the</strong> substantial data that have already been collected.The connections between coastal and upstream waters dictate that any monitoringnetwork must be national in scope, with flexibility to allow <strong>for</strong> regional differences. Forexample, geographically isolated islands must be accommodated to allow <strong>for</strong> differencesin scale, climate, temperature regimes, and limited fresh-water resources, compared tomany mainland areas.Despite decades of monitoring by many agencies, <strong>the</strong> nation still lacks a coordinatednational network. It will be necessary to coordinate and streng<strong>the</strong>n federal monitoringef<strong>for</strong>ts and <strong>the</strong>n use a partnership ef<strong>for</strong>t among state, local, territorial, tribal, and federalagencies, as well as academic and research institutions, marine labs, nongovernmentalorganizations, and volunteer groups where appropriate. States will need to be active partnersin this ef<strong>for</strong>t through a coordinated monitoring strategy that builds on and takesadvantage of work already underway by states and federal agencies.Because of <strong>the</strong> inherent overlap between inland, coastal, and open-ocean monitoringand observing, <strong>the</strong> national monitoring network should be closely linked with <strong>the</strong>Integrated <strong>Ocean</strong> Observing System (IOOS; discussed in detail in Chapter 26) and ultimatelywith a broad Earth observing system. The national monitoring network will provide<strong>the</strong> capability to observe, analyze, and <strong>for</strong>ecast natural and human-induced changesC HAPTER 15: CREATING A N ATIONAL M ONITORING N ETWORK231

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!