11.07.2015 Views

An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century - California Ocean ...

An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century - California Ocean ...

An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century - California Ocean ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Recommendation 19–21The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) should change <strong>the</strong> designation of essential fishhabitat from a species-by-species to a multispecies approach and, ultimately, to an ecosystembasedapproach. The approach should draw upon existing ef<strong>for</strong>ts to identify important habitatsand locate optimum-sized areas to protect vulnerable life-history stages of commerciallyand recreationally important species. NMFS should work with o<strong>the</strong>r management entities toprotect essential fish habitat when such areas fall outside <strong>the</strong>ir jurisdiction.This ef<strong>for</strong>t should include:• well-documented, science-based analytical methods.• consideration of ecologically valuable species that are not necessarily commerciallyimportant.• an extensive research and development program to refine existing analyticalmethods and develop additional means to identify habitats critical to sustainability andbiodiversity goals.Reducing BycatchThe 350,000,000pounds [of bycatchfrom <strong>the</strong> Alaskangroundfish fishery] ismade up of at least1,000 differentspecies. Each of <strong>the</strong>species is an integralpart of <strong>the</strong> oceansystem, ei<strong>the</strong>r as astrand in <strong>the</strong> foodweb or shelter <strong>for</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r species.—Dorothy Childers,Executive Director, AlaskaMarine ConservationCouncil, testimony to<strong>the</strong> Commission,August 2002The unintentional catch of non-targeted species by recreational and commercial fishermen,known as bycatch, is a major economic and ecological problem. One of <strong>the</strong> national standardsof <strong>the</strong> Magnuson–Stevens Act states that fishery management plans should minimizebycatch to <strong>the</strong> greatest extent practicable. Reducing bycatch is a goal that everyonecan support: <strong>for</strong> fishermen, bycatch decreases efficiency and costs money; <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> environmentalcommunity and many o<strong>the</strong>rs, bycatch is viewed as wasteful and harmful to <strong>the</strong>ecosystem; and, in <strong>the</strong> case of endangered species, bycatch can threaten a population’s survival.Never<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong> total elimination of bycatch from a fishery is probably impossible,and too great a focus on bycatch could inhibit progress on o<strong>the</strong>r issues more important toecosystem functioning.The first requirement <strong>for</strong> addressing bycatch is better in<strong>for</strong>mation. Existing fish stockassessments attempt to account <strong>for</strong> all sources of mortality <strong>for</strong> commercially targetedspecies; however, estimates of impacts on non-target species are lacking. <strong>An</strong> ecosystembasedmanagement approach will require that mortality to all components of <strong>the</strong> systembe estimated. The recently developed bycatch sampling program under <strong>the</strong> AtlanticCoastal Cooperative Statistics Program, developed in a cooperative ef<strong>for</strong>t among states,<strong>the</strong> Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, and NMFS, is a positive step in thisdirection.Bycatch in domestic fisheries is only part of <strong>the</strong> problem. International fisheries areresponsible <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> bycatch of many species, including endangered sea turtles in pelagiclongline fisheries, and many species of whales (see Chapter 20). However, a completeassessment of bycatch in international fleets is not possible due to very limited data.There are various ways to ga<strong>the</strong>r in<strong>for</strong>mation on bycatch: self-reporting by fishermen;port sampling; remote electronic monitoring using video cameras; and at-sea or shoresideobserver programs. Of <strong>the</strong>se options, use of observers is usually <strong>the</strong> most expensive;deployment of one observer usually costs from $700–$1,000 a day. The overall annualcost <strong>for</strong> monitoring an entire fishery will depend on <strong>the</strong> number of vessels in <strong>the</strong> fishery,<strong>the</strong> level of observer coverage needed, and <strong>the</strong> objectives <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> monitoring.To fully catalog all bycatch in every fishery, an observer would need to be present onevery fishing boat at all times—a prohibitively expensive proposition. Instead, bycatchmonitoring should be based on statistically significant sampling using a combination ofin<strong>for</strong>mation ga<strong>the</strong>red by fishermen, electronic monitoring, and a selected number ofobservers. There are certain situations, however, in which a high level of observer coveragemay be warranted, <strong>for</strong> example, in protecting highly endangered species, such asNorth Atlantic right whales or sea turtles, where <strong>the</strong> death of just a few animals can have298 A N O CEAN B LUEPRINT FOR THE 21ST C ENTURY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!