11.07.2015 Views

An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century - California Ocean ...

An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century - California Ocean ...

An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century - California Ocean ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 29.1 (continued) U.S. Participation in International <strong>Ocean</strong> AgreementsAgreement NameDescriptionBiodiversity and WildlifeInternational Convention<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Regulation ofWhaling (ICRW)Convention on Wetlandsof InternationalImportance, Especiallyas Waterfowl Habitat(Ramsar Convention)Convention onInternational Trade inEndangered Species(CITES)Convention Concerning<strong>the</strong> Protection of <strong>the</strong>World Cultural andNatural HeritageThe ICRW establishes <strong>the</strong> International WhalingCommission, which regulates commercial andaboriginal subsistence whaling.The Ramsar Convention provides <strong>the</strong> framework<strong>for</strong> national action and international cooperation<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> conservation and wise use of wetlands. Thesystem currently includes 1368 wetland sites, totaling120 million hectares (about 296 million acres).The goal of CITES is to ensure that internationaltrade in wild animals and plants does notthreaten <strong>the</strong>ir survival. Trade in listed species isregulated through a permit system.The World Heritage Convention defines <strong>the</strong> kindof natural or cultural sites which are eligible <strong>for</strong>inscription on <strong>the</strong> World Heritage List, and setsout <strong>the</strong> duties of State Parties in identifyingpotential sites and <strong>the</strong>ir role in protecting andpreserving <strong>the</strong>m.Date ofAgreementDateEnteredInto ForceHas <strong>the</strong>U.S.Signed?Has <strong>the</strong>U.S.Ratified?12/02/46 11/10/48 Yes Yes02/02/71 12/21/75 Yes Yes03/03/73 07/01/75 Yes Yes11/23/72 12/17/75 Not YesapplicableChange, and Agenda 21—a comprehensive set of international guidelines <strong>for</strong> achievingsustainable development in all areas, including <strong>the</strong> oceans and coasts.<strong>An</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r product of <strong>the</strong> Earth Summit was <strong>the</strong> Convention on Biological Diversity(CBD), which aims to conserve biological diversity worldwide while providing guidance<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> sustainable use of its components and <strong>the</strong> equitable sharing of any benefits derivedfrom <strong>the</strong> use of genetic resources. In 1995, <strong>the</strong> parties to <strong>the</strong> CBD issued <strong>the</strong> Jakarta Mandate,which initiated a marine and coastal resource work program focused on five topics: integratedocean and coastal area management; ocean and coastal protected areas; sustainableuse of ocean and coastal living resources; marine aquaculture; and non-native species.Most nations have ratified <strong>the</strong> CBD, but <strong>the</strong> United States has not, largely because ofdivergent views regarding <strong>the</strong> ownership of genetic resources. Many coastal nations regulateaccess by <strong>for</strong>eign scientists and explorers to genetic resources in waters under <strong>the</strong>irjurisdiction. These nations often seek royalties from <strong>the</strong> commercialization of <strong>the</strong>seresources, including pharmaceutical products resulting from bioprospecting. The UnitedStates has expressed concerns about balancing legal protections <strong>for</strong> private biotechnologyinvestors with <strong>the</strong> rights of sovereign nations to <strong>the</strong>ir resources.Because <strong>the</strong> United States is not a party to <strong>the</strong> CBD, <strong>the</strong> nation cannot directlyparticipate in <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>the</strong> CBD regime or in negotiations on its protocols.For example, <strong>the</strong> Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, which provides a framework <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> safetransfer, handling, and use of living modified organisms, has important implications <strong>for</strong> U.S.economic sectors. O<strong>the</strong>r CBD areas of interest to <strong>the</strong> United States include ef<strong>for</strong>ts to combatinvasive non-native species, creation of compilations of marine scientific data, and facilitationof member nation negotiations concerning access and collection agreements <strong>for</strong> scientists.Recommendation 29–2The National <strong>Ocean</strong> Council should coordinate an expedited review and analysis of <strong>the</strong>ocean-related components of <strong>the</strong> United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity andrecommend to <strong>the</strong> U.S. Department of State whe<strong>the</strong>r, from an ocean perspective, ratificationof this treaty would be beneficial to U.S. interests.448 A N O CEAN B LUEPRINT FOR THE 21ST C ENTURY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!