11.07.2015 Views

An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century - California Ocean ...

An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century - California Ocean ...

An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century - California Ocean ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PhotolinkHumans love to observe marine mammals, such as manatees, in <strong>the</strong>ir natural habitats, but close contactwith <strong>the</strong>se animals can negatively impact populations. Interactions can disrupt natural feeding andmating behaviors and increase <strong>the</strong> risk of physical harm from boat or propeller strikes.Considerable deference has been given to <strong>the</strong> professional judgment of agency personnelregarding which activities are permissible. Both agencies have qualified and dedicatedpeople reviewing applications, but <strong>the</strong> process is necessarily subjective and a personnelchange can mean <strong>the</strong> difference between approval and denial of similar permits. This caseby-casedecision making has led to inconsistencies, a lack of clear standards, and uncertainprotection <strong>for</strong> marine mammals.Most permit applications are processed according to <strong>the</strong> same procedures, regardless of<strong>the</strong> level of potential harm to marine mammals. As a result, limited agency resources canbe wasted reviewing relatively insignificant permit applications, while insufficient attentionis paid to more worrisome activities. A shift to programmatic permitting wouldenable more proactive and efficient handling of <strong>the</strong> bulk of permit applications, whilereducing <strong>the</strong> costs and burdens on agency personnel.Programmatic permitting would allow <strong>for</strong> quick approval of activities on a definedlist, specifying broad parameters within which those activities could occur. A programmaticpermit could also include mitigation and data collection measures, such as requiringthat whale-watching boats keep at a certain distance from <strong>the</strong> animals and maintainrecords of species observed and <strong>the</strong>ir locations.In addition to streamlining permitting, clear and consistent en<strong>for</strong>cement is needed toensure compliance with permit conditions, and penalties must be stringent enough to discouragenoncompliance. <strong>An</strong>y changes to <strong>the</strong> permitting processes under <strong>the</strong> MMPA willhave to be consistent with <strong>the</strong> requirements of <strong>the</strong> National Environmental Policy Act.Recommendation 20–7The National <strong>Ocean</strong>ic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) should implement programmaticpermitting <strong>for</strong> activities that affect marine mammals, wherever possible. Case-by-casepermitting, which is more resource intensive, should be used <strong>for</strong> activities that do not fitwithin any programmatic category or when circumstances indicate a greater likelihood ofharm to marine animals. The National <strong>Ocean</strong> Council (NOC) should create an interagency teamto recommend activities appropriate <strong>for</strong> programmatic permitting, those that are inappropriate,and those that are potentially appropriate pending additional scientific in<strong>for</strong>mation.To carry this out:• <strong>the</strong> interagency team, under <strong>the</strong> oversight of <strong>the</strong> NOC’s Committee on <strong>Ocean</strong> ResourceManagement, should include representatives from NOAA, <strong>the</strong> National ScienceC HAPTER 20: PROTECTING M ARINE M AMMALS AND E NDANGERED M ARINE S PECIES313

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!