11.07.2015 Views

An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century - California Ocean ...

An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century - California Ocean ...

An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century - California Ocean ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Box 24.1 Offshore Liquefied Natural Gas Ports May Be on <strong>the</strong> HorizonThe U.S. Department of Energy’s Energy In<strong>for</strong>mation Administration and private industrytrade associations predict that <strong>the</strong> nation’s demand <strong>for</strong> natural gas will continue to rise. i,iiNotwithstanding estimates of increased natural gas production from <strong>the</strong> Gulf of Mexico(discussed earlier in this chapter), <strong>the</strong> United States is no longer self-sufficient in that energyresource. A primary way to meet rising demand is through substantially increased imports ofliquefied natural gas (LNG). In 2003, LNG supplied only about 2 percent of U.S. natural gas needs;by 2010, it is expected to provide some 10 percent of such needs. iiiLNG is transported in large, specialized tanker ships that keep <strong>the</strong> gas cooled to approximately260°F below zero to reduce <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>for</strong> shipping purposes. LNG tankers deliver <strong>the</strong>gas to special port facilities, where <strong>the</strong> commodity is re-gasified, ei<strong>the</strong>r on <strong>the</strong> ship or at <strong>the</strong> portfacility, and <strong>the</strong>n transported through pipelines to customers.The United States currently has four LNG import terminals in coastal port areas inMassachusetts, Maryland, Georgia, and Louisiana. Over three dozen new terminals intendedto serve <strong>the</strong> U.S. market (including eight projects proposed <strong>for</strong> Eastern Canada, <strong>the</strong> Bahamas,and Baja Cali<strong>for</strong>nia, Mexico) are in varying stages of planning. iv For many complex reasons, itis possible that only a few of <strong>the</strong> projected projects will be built. v However, of <strong>the</strong> proposednew LNG projects, a number are likely be located offshore, on <strong>the</strong> outer Continental Shelf.Congress has responded to <strong>the</strong> need <strong>for</strong> a broad and cohesive ocean governance structure<strong>for</strong> offshore LNG ports. The federal Deepwater Port Act (DPA) was amended in 2002 toauthorize <strong>the</strong> siting, construction, and operation of LNG terminals on <strong>the</strong> OCS, seaward ofstate boundaries. vi The U.S. Coast Guard and <strong>the</strong> Maritime Administration are <strong>the</strong> primaryagencies responsible <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> licensing process under <strong>the</strong> DPA. When it was moved to <strong>the</strong> U.S.Department of Homeland Security, <strong>the</strong> Coast Guard’s authority under <strong>the</strong> DPA was transferredwith it under <strong>the</strong> terms of an interagency memorandum of understanding (MOU).The MOU also included a number of o<strong>the</strong>r agencies that have regulatory authority over someaspect of DPA licensing, or o<strong>the</strong>r aspects of LNG transportation and use on <strong>the</strong> OCS oronshore. These agencies include <strong>the</strong> U.S. Departments of <strong>the</strong> Interior, Transportation, andCommerce, <strong>the</strong> Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and <strong>the</strong> U.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency.One of <strong>the</strong> interesting provisions of <strong>the</strong> DPA, which is applicable to <strong>the</strong> siting and operationof offshore LNG ports, stipulates that that <strong>the</strong> Secretary of Transportation may not issuea license without <strong>the</strong> approval of <strong>the</strong> Governor of each coastal state adjacent to <strong>the</strong> proposedfacility. This gubernatorial approval process is in addition to <strong>the</strong> federal consistency authorityexercised by states with approved coastal zone management programs.Although <strong>the</strong> recent amendments to <strong>the</strong> DPA establish an ocean governance structure<strong>for</strong> LNG facilities, with designated agency mandates and responsibilities, <strong>the</strong> siting of newLNG facilities and management of LNG tanker traffic should be fully integrated with <strong>the</strong>coordinated offshore management regime discussed in Chapter 6.i Energy In<strong>for</strong>mation Administration. “<strong>An</strong>nual Energy Outlook 2004 with Projections to 2025” Accessed June 3, 2004.ii National Petroleum Council. “Balancing Natural Gas Policy—Fueling <strong>the</strong> Demands of a Growing Economy, ExecutiveSummary.” Accessed May 19, 2004.iii Energy In<strong>for</strong>mation Administration. “<strong>An</strong>nual Energy Outlook 2004 with Projections to 2025” Accessed June 3, 2004.iv Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Office of Energy Projects. “Existing and Proposed North American LNGTerminals, June, 2004.” Accessed June 24, 2004.v Energy In<strong>for</strong>mation Administration. Reassessment of Liquefied Natural Gas Supply Potential in “<strong>An</strong>nual EnergyOutlook 2004 with Projections to 2025.” Accessed June 3, 2004.vi The Deepwater Port Act, as amended by Section 106 of <strong>the</strong> Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002, Pub. L.107–295, November 25, 2002.358 A N O CEAN B LUEPRINT FOR THE 21ST C ENTURY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!