26.11.2012 Views

Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS

Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS

Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Dative clitics continue to license floating quantifiers when doubling a focussed<br />

strong pronoun, as in (151)a, or ra<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> contextualized (152). 70<br />

105<br />

(152) D'abord nous avons contacté les victimes, puis les témoins. Qu<strong>and</strong> on<br />

{lesi a tousi interrogés EUXi / euxi aussi} / {leuri a tousi parlé à EUXi /<br />

euxi aussii}, on a clos l'enquête.<br />

First we contacted <strong>the</strong> victims, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> witnesses. When we {<strong>the</strong>m.A<br />

have all interrogated THEM / <strong>the</strong>m too} / we {<strong>the</strong>m.D have all spoken to<br />

THEM/ <strong>the</strong>m too}, we closed <strong>the</strong> investigation.<br />

(Rezac 2010b)<br />

Morphological accusative clitic deletion does not affect floating quantifier licensing<br />

in grammars where it can affect 3PL les, as discussed in chapter 2:<br />

(153) Je les/∅i lui ai tousi déjà présentés.<br />

I <strong>the</strong>m.A her.D have all already introduced<br />

(chapter 2)<br />

Clitic doubling <strong>and</strong> clitic deletion closely control for any surface requirements<br />

to which floating quantifiers might be sensitive. The failure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> strong pronoun<br />

o <strong>the</strong> PCC repair to license <strong>the</strong>m is good evidence that it is missing <strong>the</strong> high Aposition<br />

from which clitics do so, <strong>and</strong> so differs from <strong>the</strong>m syntactically, in <strong>the</strong><br />

same way as focussed dative <strong>and</strong> all locative strong pronouns. 71<br />

4.4.3 Condition B<br />

3 rd person dative <strong>and</strong> accusative clitics are regulated by Conditions A <strong>and</strong> B <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Binding Theory. 3SG lui, 3PL leur must be disjoint from <strong>the</strong> subject, SE se must<br />

be anaphoric to it. Strong pronouns can usually be anaphoric to <strong>the</strong> subject, even<br />

without -même 'self' (Couquaux 1977, Morin 1978, Zribi-Hertz 1980, 2003, 2008).<br />

This includes locative strong pronouns, <strong>and</strong> focussed dative ones for those speakers<br />

who allow <strong>the</strong>m without clitic doubling (note 60):<br />

70 The questionnaire for (152) results in nearly perfect acceptability for <strong>the</strong> accusative for most<br />

speakers, but <strong>the</strong> dative splits into <strong>the</strong> same score for four speakers, sharp degradation for two,<br />

<strong>and</strong> medium for three. Fur<strong>the</strong>r inquiry indicates that <strong>the</strong> degradation is due to <strong>the</strong> failure <strong>of</strong> datives<br />

to license floating quantifiers <strong>and</strong> not <strong>the</strong> doubling, reflecting <strong>the</strong> dialectal split in note 59.<br />

71 Doubled strong pronouns control for <strong>the</strong> possibility that floating quantifier licensing would be<br />

interfered with by a linked DP following <strong>the</strong> quantifier (P. Svenonius p.c.; cf. Belletti 2005,<br />

Rezac 2010b). Clitic deletion controls for sensitivity to a surface-overt antecedent. It bears on a<br />

point due to D. Pesetsky (p.c.): floating quantifiers are not licensed by covert A'-movement even<br />

when licensed by overt A'-movement (as in McCloskey 2000). Fitzpatrick (2006) develops a<br />

comprehensive analysis where A-licensed floating quantifiers are anaphoric adverbials whereas<br />

A'-licensed ones are str<strong>and</strong>ed adnominal ones. On it, Pesetsky's point might be related to <strong>the</strong> lack<br />

<strong>of</strong> need for covert movement to pied-pipe (Chomsky 1995, but cf. Pesetsky 2000). O<strong>the</strong>r overtcovert<br />

differences could be responsible, such as <strong>the</strong> ability <strong>of</strong> covert movement to move over<br />

longer distances <strong>and</strong> so skip <strong>the</strong> floating site (cf. Richards 2001: chapter 2).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!