26.11.2012 Views

Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS

Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS

Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

122<br />

Blocking <strong>of</strong> this sort captures well <strong>the</strong> character <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> repair as <strong>the</strong> response<br />

to a problem. However, it fares ill in its generality, for <strong>the</strong> repair turns out to be<br />

specific to <strong>the</strong> PCC. French presents context after context where dative <strong>and</strong> accusative<br />

clitics are unavailable, yet unfocussed strong pronouns are likewise barred.<br />

Ineffable structures are <strong>the</strong> result. This section examines <strong>the</strong>m. First come those<br />

that would create clitic clusters surface-identical or close to those barred by <strong>the</strong><br />

PCC: multiple dative clitics, arbitrary gaps, mediopassive se + dative clitics. Next,<br />

those where a cliticization site is absent or unreachable: DPs, modifiers, causatives,<br />

coordinations <strong>and</strong> modifications. In none does <strong>the</strong> unavailability <strong>of</strong> a dative<br />

or accusative clitic permit an unfocussed strong pronoun in its place, nor can <strong>the</strong><br />

locative clitic substitute for a dative in <strong>the</strong> y-grammar. The PCC remains as <strong>the</strong><br />

sole context licensing unfocussed strong pronouns for dative or accusative arguments.<br />

The <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> PCC repair must account for this fundamental fact.<br />

<strong>Modular</strong>ity will prove to play a key role, both in <strong>the</strong> discussion below, <strong>and</strong> more<br />

generally still in <strong>the</strong> final analysis <strong>of</strong> chapter 5.7.<br />

4.6.2 Multiple dative clitics<br />

Clitic climbing may bring toge<strong>the</strong>r several dative clitics, as in (187) where a<br />

raising verb with a dative experiencer embeds a small clause with a dative <strong>of</strong> its<br />

own. The outcome is not tolerated by any for 3.DAT + 3.DAT clusters, by some<br />

only for 1/2.DAT + 3.DAT, while 1/2.DAT + 2/1.DAT clusters are intermediate.<br />

When such clusters are rejected, <strong>the</strong> PCC repair is impossible, (188), both in its<br />

strong pronoun <strong>and</strong> locative clitic incarnations (Couquaux 1975: 53, Kayne 1975:<br />

175, Tasmowski 1985: 259 note 12, Rezac 2010a).<br />

(187) a. Ils me semblent tme [SC tils [AP fidèles aux manifestants]].<br />

b. % Ilsi me leurk/*i semblent tme [SC tils [AP fidèles tlui]].<br />

<strong>the</strong>y me.D <strong>the</strong>m.D seem faithful to.<strong>the</strong> demonstrators<br />

They seem to me faithful to <strong>the</strong> demonstrators/ % <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

(188) a. Elle me semble infidèle à Jean-Jacques<br />

b. *Elle me te semble infidèle<br />

c. ?*Elle me semble infidèle à toi<br />

she me.D you.D seems unfaithful to Jean-Jacques / you<br />

She seems to me unfaithful to Jean-Jacques/*you.<br />

(Kayne 1975: 175, cf. Postal 1990: 177)<br />

d. ¥ *Paul me leur semble reconnaissant.<br />

e. ¥ *Paul m' y semble reconnaissant (, à ses amis).<br />

f. ¥ ?*Paul me semble reconnaissant à eux<br />

Paul me.D <strong>the</strong>m.D/LOC seems grateful to <strong>the</strong>m to his friends<br />

Paul seems to me to be grateful to <strong>the</strong>m (his friends).<br />

(Couquaux 1975: 53, 71 note 11)<br />

g. *Paul lui leur paraît antipathique/sympathique/désagréable.<br />

h. *Paul lui paraît antipathique/sympathique/désagréable à eux.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!