Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS
Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS
Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
122<br />
Blocking <strong>of</strong> this sort captures well <strong>the</strong> character <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> repair as <strong>the</strong> response<br />
to a problem. However, it fares ill in its generality, for <strong>the</strong> repair turns out to be<br />
specific to <strong>the</strong> PCC. French presents context after context where dative <strong>and</strong> accusative<br />
clitics are unavailable, yet unfocussed strong pronouns are likewise barred.<br />
Ineffable structures are <strong>the</strong> result. This section examines <strong>the</strong>m. First come those<br />
that would create clitic clusters surface-identical or close to those barred by <strong>the</strong><br />
PCC: multiple dative clitics, arbitrary gaps, mediopassive se + dative clitics. Next,<br />
those where a cliticization site is absent or unreachable: DPs, modifiers, causatives,<br />
coordinations <strong>and</strong> modifications. In none does <strong>the</strong> unavailability <strong>of</strong> a dative<br />
or accusative clitic permit an unfocussed strong pronoun in its place, nor can <strong>the</strong><br />
locative clitic substitute for a dative in <strong>the</strong> y-grammar. The PCC remains as <strong>the</strong><br />
sole context licensing unfocussed strong pronouns for dative or accusative arguments.<br />
The <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> PCC repair must account for this fundamental fact.<br />
<strong>Modular</strong>ity will prove to play a key role, both in <strong>the</strong> discussion below, <strong>and</strong> more<br />
generally still in <strong>the</strong> final analysis <strong>of</strong> chapter 5.7.<br />
4.6.2 Multiple dative clitics<br />
Clitic climbing may bring toge<strong>the</strong>r several dative clitics, as in (187) where a<br />
raising verb with a dative experiencer embeds a small clause with a dative <strong>of</strong> its<br />
own. The outcome is not tolerated by any for 3.DAT + 3.DAT clusters, by some<br />
only for 1/2.DAT + 3.DAT, while 1/2.DAT + 2/1.DAT clusters are intermediate.<br />
When such clusters are rejected, <strong>the</strong> PCC repair is impossible, (188), both in its<br />
strong pronoun <strong>and</strong> locative clitic incarnations (Couquaux 1975: 53, Kayne 1975:<br />
175, Tasmowski 1985: 259 note 12, Rezac 2010a).<br />
(187) a. Ils me semblent tme [SC tils [AP fidèles aux manifestants]].<br />
b. % Ilsi me leurk/*i semblent tme [SC tils [AP fidèles tlui]].<br />
<strong>the</strong>y me.D <strong>the</strong>m.D seem faithful to.<strong>the</strong> demonstrators<br />
They seem to me faithful to <strong>the</strong> demonstrators/ % <strong>the</strong>m.<br />
(188) a. Elle me semble infidèle à Jean-Jacques<br />
b. *Elle me te semble infidèle<br />
c. ?*Elle me semble infidèle à toi<br />
she me.D you.D seems unfaithful to Jean-Jacques / you<br />
She seems to me unfaithful to Jean-Jacques/*you.<br />
(Kayne 1975: 175, cf. Postal 1990: 177)<br />
d. ¥ *Paul me leur semble reconnaissant.<br />
e. ¥ *Paul m' y semble reconnaissant (, à ses amis).<br />
f. ¥ ?*Paul me semble reconnaissant à eux<br />
Paul me.D <strong>the</strong>m.D/LOC seems grateful to <strong>the</strong>m to his friends<br />
Paul seems to me to be grateful to <strong>the</strong>m (his friends).<br />
(Couquaux 1975: 53, 71 note 11)<br />
g. *Paul lui leur paraît antipathique/sympathique/désagréable.<br />
h. *Paul lui paraît antipathique/sympathique/désagréable à eux.