Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS
Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS
Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
187<br />
distinction between valued uninterpretable <strong>and</strong> interpretable <strong>features</strong> is lost<br />
(Chomsky 2000a: 131, 2001: 5, 2008: 154f., Epstein <strong>and</strong> Seely 2002). Yet o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
operations might or might not be allowed to take place on <strong>the</strong> same cycle as<br />
Agree, in parallel with it; for instance, while T Agrees <strong>the</strong> CP layer might be<br />
Merged <strong>and</strong> embed it (Chomsky 2001, 2007, 2008, Hiraiwa 2010). We will have<br />
occasion to return to this issue for ℜ. 135<br />
The construction <strong>of</strong> a syntactic object from <strong>the</strong> numeration terminates in its<br />
Transfer to <strong>the</strong> interfacing systems. In <strong>the</strong> model <strong>of</strong> Chomsky (2000a), (284), <strong>the</strong><br />
lexical item that triggers Transfer (upon Agree), <strong>the</strong> head <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> phase H, sends its<br />
complement γ to <strong>the</strong> external systems: H Transfers γ. The Transferred material γ is<br />
removed from syntax <strong>and</strong> becomes invisible to it. This invisibility is <strong>the</strong> Phase<br />
Impenetrability Condition. The specifiers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> H, β in (284), are not Transferred<br />
with γ. They belong to <strong>the</strong> edge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> phase that remains visible to operations in<br />
<strong>the</strong> next higher phase, to α <strong>and</strong> Z, to be Transferred with it. This edge remains accessible<br />
for inclusion in objects constructed from o<strong>the</strong>r numerations, such as that<br />
<strong>of</strong> Z/α in (284). The edge <strong>of</strong> a completed phase remains in <strong>the</strong> workspace, into<br />
which <strong>the</strong> next numeration places its initial selection <strong>of</strong> lexical items, <strong>and</strong> in which<br />
assembly proceeds (Chomsky 2000a: 106).<br />
(284) For [ZP Z α [HP β [ H γ]]] (Z, H phase-heads): α, Z see only β, H.<br />
The head <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> phase, H, ought to be Transferred with its complement, because<br />
it is H's valued uninterpretable <strong>features</strong> that need to be deleted. However, H<br />
ought to also remain visible to selection from <strong>the</strong> higher phase. Richards (2007)<br />
<strong>and</strong> Chomsky (2007, 2008) resolve this tension by giving each phase a pair <strong>of</strong><br />
heads in a selectional relationship, such as C-T. The lower head (T) Agrees <strong>and</strong><br />
undergoes Transfer, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> higher head (C) remains at <strong>the</strong> edge. An alternative is<br />
that Transfer strips <strong>the</strong> valued <strong>features</strong> from <strong>the</strong> phase head <strong>and</strong> leaves <strong>the</strong> interpretable<br />
ones. Here it will principally matter that Agree triggers Transfer.<br />
When <strong>the</strong> complement <strong>of</strong> a phase-head Transfers <strong>and</strong> fails to meet Full Interpretation,<br />
ℜ can modify <strong>the</strong> numeration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> current phase by adding an uninterpretable<br />
feature to its elements, up to <strong>and</strong> including <strong>the</strong> edge <strong>and</strong> head <strong>of</strong> any embedded<br />
phase. For Z in (284), this is α, β, H but not γ, which has already been<br />
Transferred. In this, ℜ differs from (281), (282) where only <strong>the</strong> current phase-head<br />
Z may be given a feature.<br />
135 The notion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cycle for this purpose is to be distinguished from o<strong>the</strong>r uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> term. For<br />
instance, <strong>the</strong> Earliness Principle might require a probe to Agree upon Merge, or as soon as possible<br />
in <strong>the</strong> derivation, or while it is <strong>the</strong> label, which will dynamically restrict its search-space to<br />
certain objects such as its sister or its maximal projection. This is does not say anything about <strong>the</strong><br />
possibility <strong>of</strong> building up o<strong>the</strong>r structures or <strong>the</strong> Agree <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r probes at <strong>the</strong> same time, so a<br />
probe on T can be restricted to <strong>the</strong> TP while contemporaneously (co-cyclically) C is Merged with<br />
<strong>the</strong> TP <strong>and</strong> its probe builds [Spec, CP]. For discussion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> search-space <strong>of</strong> a probe, cf. Chomsky<br />
(1995: e.g. 234f., 2000a: 132ff.), Richards (1999), Rezac (2003), Béjar <strong>and</strong> Rezac (2009).