Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS
Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS
Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
119<br />
The causee <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> connaître-class ceases to have <strong>the</strong> prominence to control<br />
into adjuncts precisely when <strong>the</strong>re is a 1 st /2 nd person accusative clitic. The relevant<br />
notion <strong>of</strong> prominence has been argued to be c-comm<strong>and</strong> at LF (L<strong>and</strong>au 2010: 8.1;<br />
cf. Legendre 1989a: 771 note 23, 777 note 26). Thus <strong>the</strong> à-phrase causee <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
connaître class escapes <strong>the</strong> PCC because it can be lower than regular à-causees,<br />
below <strong>the</strong> direct object, as (122) predicts. These low causees may be prepositional<br />
datives, but <strong>the</strong>re are o<strong>the</strong>r options, such as low applicative datives in <strong>the</strong> minimal<br />
domain <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> direct object. The possibility is lexically limited, <strong>and</strong> not shared<br />
even by o<strong>the</strong>r experiencer-agent verbs like aimer 'like, love'. 81<br />
4.5.5 Experiencer datives<br />
The behaviour <strong>of</strong> regular causees is found also with ano<strong>the</strong>r applicative dative,<br />
<strong>the</strong> experiencer <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> verb falloir 'need'. Falloir has a unique structure in French,<br />
(182). It is a transitive with an accusative direct object or <strong>the</strong>me, a dative experiencer,<br />
but an expletive subject, in violation <strong>of</strong> Burzio's Generalization.<br />
(182) a. Il faut ces gens à mon amie (pour l'aventure).<br />
b. Il les faut à mon amie<br />
c. Il les lui faut<br />
it <strong>the</strong>m.A her.D needs <strong>the</strong>se people to my friend (for <strong>the</strong> adventure)<br />
My friend/she needs <strong>the</strong>se people (for <strong>the</strong> adventure).<br />
The meaning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> experiencer <strong>of</strong> falloir suggests an applicative dative, like<br />
that <strong>of</strong> psych-unaccusatives such as manquer 'miss, be missing', ra<strong>the</strong>r than a<br />
prepositional indirect object. It is confirmed by various diagnostics; for instance,<br />
in (183) <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me can bind into <strong>the</strong> à-phrase dative with ditransitives, but not<br />
with falloir (cf. Postal 1989: 9, 37f., 50, 1990: 171f., Legendre 1989a, Herschensohn<br />
1992, 1999, L<strong>and</strong>au 2010: 8.1, Roberge <strong>and</strong> Troberg 2007: 316f.).<br />
(183) a. J'ai décrit <strong>Phi</strong>lippe à lui-même.<br />
I have described <strong>Phi</strong>lippe to him-self<br />
b. *Il faut <strong>Phi</strong>lippe à lui-même<br />
it needs <strong>Phi</strong>lippe to him-self<br />
(Postal 1990: 171f.)<br />
81 Postal (1989) develops a battery <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r diagnostics, such as <strong>the</strong> binding in La psychiatrie a<br />
fait (se) connaître Marcel à lui-même 'Psychiatry made know Marceli to himselfi = made Marcel<br />
know himself' (Kayne 1975: 372). They seem persuasive, but <strong>the</strong> details are complex, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
judgments on <strong>the</strong>m <strong>and</strong> on (181)a turn out to vary across speakers who yet keep <strong>the</strong> exceptionality<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> connaître-class in allowing 1/2/SE.ACC clitics. It may be that some speakers analyze<br />
à-causees in <strong>the</strong> connaître-class quite differently, essentially as adjuncts; <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> à-phrases for<br />
agents in Middle French bears keeping in mind (Zink 1997: 277). An interfering factor in evaluating<br />
Postal's examples are <strong>the</strong> facts about 3.ACC animate clitics in note 79.