Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS
Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS
Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
161<br />
(Etxepare <strong>and</strong> Oyharçabal 2008ab, Etxepare 2010, cf. Albizu 2001). The PCC repair<br />
occurs invisibly in Eastern Basque, because it creates nonagreeing datives that<br />
already exist. Along with its nonagreeing datives generally, <strong>the</strong> nonagreeing datives<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> repair cannot serve in applicative functions, (249), (250). 117<br />
Through Basque <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> PCC can be exp<strong>and</strong>ed to include unaccusatives<br />
(Albizu 1997ab, 2009, Rezac 2008c, 2009, forthc). Unaccusatives with<br />
purely applicative datives do not permit 1 st /2 nd person absolutive subjects, (251).<br />
Among such applicative datives are experiencers <strong>of</strong> psych-verbs like gustatu 'like',<br />
possessors, <strong>and</strong> datives <strong>of</strong> interest, but not indirect objects that can appear in <strong>the</strong><br />
prepositional construction, such as <strong>the</strong> goal-<strong>of</strong>-motion <strong>of</strong> hurbildu 'approach'.<br />
(251) a. Miren-ij hurbiltzen / gustatzen zai-zkii-oj / *di-oj-te<br />
Miren-D coming / liking R.3pAi.3sDj / R.3sDi.3pE<br />
They are approaching Miren / Miren likes <strong>the</strong>m.<br />
b. Miren-ij hurbiltzen / ?*gustatzen ni-atzai-oj.<br />
Miren-D approaching / liking R.1sAi.3sDj<br />
I am approaching Miren / ?*Miren likes me.<br />
(Eastern/Western Basque)<br />
This difference for <strong>the</strong> PCC between <strong>the</strong> applicative construction above <strong>the</strong><br />
absolutive <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> prepositional one below it is as in transitives. Unaccusatives<br />
differ from transitives in one important respect. They allow datives in <strong>the</strong> prepositional<br />
construction to agree, while in transitives <strong>the</strong>y do not exist in Western<br />
Basque, <strong>and</strong> do not agree in Eastern Basque. Both <strong>the</strong> datives in (251) show <strong>the</strong><br />
same case <strong>and</strong> agreement, although c-comm<strong>and</strong> diagnostics identify one as applicative<br />
<strong>and</strong> one as prepositional. The reasons for <strong>the</strong> difference are unknown. However,<br />
<strong>the</strong>y have for consequence that in (251) <strong>the</strong> PCC differentiates between<br />
structures with o<strong>the</strong>rwise identical case <strong>and</strong> agreement morphology, distinct only<br />
in <strong>the</strong>ir syntax. The same will be seen in Chinook (section 5.6). There is naturally<br />
no analogue <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> PCC repair in (248)b. Applicative-only datives like experiencers<br />
cannot st<strong>and</strong> in full PPs, <strong>and</strong> prepositional datives do not create <strong>the</strong> PCC. 118<br />
In Basque <strong>the</strong>n, <strong>the</strong> PCC arises with applicative but not prepositional datives, in<br />
both transitives <strong>and</strong> unaccusatives. This symmetry is unsurprising if <strong>the</strong> PCC is related<br />
to <strong>the</strong> Agree/Case system, since in ergative-absolutive languages <strong>the</strong> transitive<br />
object <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> unaccusative subject participate in <strong>the</strong> same Agree/Case rela-<br />
117 In French datives in <strong>the</strong> prepositional construction are still defective PPs, unable to host pronouns,<br />
in contrast to locative ones in <strong>the</strong> same position that are full PPs. In Eastern Basque <strong>the</strong><br />
matter remains to be investigated, but a dialectal difference in <strong>the</strong> binding <strong>of</strong> emphatic anaphora<br />
suggests that dialects may differ on this (Albizu 2001): full PPs in Rebuschi's (1995) variété restreinte,<br />
defective ones in his variété élargie.<br />
118 For prepositional datives in unaccusatives, Eastern Basque can omit agreement as in transitives;<br />
in Western Basque <strong>the</strong> facts are unclear <strong>and</strong> interact with a tendency to replace <strong>the</strong>m by<br />
full PPs like allatives. For <strong>the</strong>ories <strong>of</strong> agreeing prepositional datives, which are <strong>the</strong>reby automatically<br />
immune to <strong>the</strong> PCC like French locative clitics, see Baker (1996: 9.3.2), <strong>and</strong> Rezac (2008a,<br />
2009, forthc) building on O'Herin (2000, 2001).