26.11.2012 Views

Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS

Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS

Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

176<br />

Structure: a syntactic structure with a clitic blocks one with a strong pronoun because<br />

it distributes <strong>the</strong> same <strong>features</strong> across fewer lexicalized terminals.<br />

Minimize Structure as well is highly constrained. It can only choose between<br />

structures that differ in <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> functional content above a shared lexical<br />

item. For <strong>the</strong> PCC in French, it works very well. A cliticization failure is viewed<br />

as <strong>the</strong> failure to meet a clitic's syntactic requirement to attach to a host in <strong>the</strong><br />

clause. When <strong>the</strong> PCC prevents cliticization, this need is not met, <strong>the</strong> structure<br />

with a clitic crashes, <strong>and</strong> so a strong pronoun is licensed. Yet Minimize Structure<br />

predicts <strong>the</strong> same for all <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r syntactic <strong>and</strong> interpretive cliticization failures in<br />

French, in none <strong>of</strong> which do dative <strong>and</strong> accusative strong pronouns become available:<br />

in adjectival modifiers, causatives, coordinate structures, <strong>and</strong> so on (section<br />

6.6). Kayne (2000: chapter 9) reaches this conclusion more generally about French<br />

pronouns. Minimize Structure is too general.<br />

What is needed is a global mechanism like Minimize Structure, yet restricted<br />

so as to respond to <strong>the</strong> PCC but not to <strong>the</strong>se o<strong>the</strong>r problems. At <strong>the</strong> same time, it<br />

must be supple enough to encompass <strong>the</strong> various forms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> repair, from adding<br />

an ergative to streng<strong>the</strong>ning a PP, each hopefully emerging <strong>the</strong> from independent<br />

principles <strong>and</strong> parameters <strong>of</strong> a language. The guiding intuition here is (268):<br />

(268) The PCC repairs are <strong>the</strong> minimal addition <strong>of</strong> an Agree/Case capacity to a<br />

structure in response to <strong>the</strong> PCC as a failure <strong>of</strong> an Agree/Case licensing.<br />

Within <strong>the</strong> framework assumed here, <strong>the</strong> Agree/Case mechanism is driven by<br />

uninterpretable <strong>features</strong>, so (268) falls under <strong>the</strong> addition <strong>of</strong> an uninterpretable feature<br />

in response to a problem, ℜ in (38). ℜ finds itself narrowly circumscribed by<br />

<strong>the</strong> architecture <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> system in which it is set: strong modularity <strong>and</strong> phase-based<br />

cyclicity. The next section develops <strong>the</strong>se proposals.<br />

(38) ℜ: An uninterpretable feature may enter <strong>the</strong> numeration only if needed for<br />

Full Interpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> syntactic structure built from it.<br />

5.4 The Minimalist Program: uninterpretability, interfaces,<br />

<strong>and</strong> repairs<br />

5.4.1 Uninterpretable <strong>features</strong>: phi, Case, <strong>and</strong> Agree<br />

The Minimalist Program MP investigates <strong>the</strong> character <strong>of</strong> syntax in light <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

systems with which it interfaces. The language faculty consists <strong>of</strong> systems specifying<br />

well-formed objects <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> mappings between <strong>the</strong>m. Among <strong>the</strong>m are syntax,<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> external systems <strong>of</strong> realization <strong>and</strong> interpretation, PF <strong>and</strong> LF, perhaps unitary,<br />

perhaps cover-terms for diverse systems such as phonology <strong>and</strong> morphology<br />

at PF, <strong>the</strong>matic <strong>and</strong> quantificational structure at LF. The PF <strong>and</strong> LF modules are

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!