Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS
Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS
Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
156<br />
5.2 The Person Case Constraint<br />
5.2.1 The Agree/Case approach<br />
Chapter 4 examined <strong>the</strong> Person Case Constraint (PCC) <strong>and</strong> its repair in French.<br />
Departing from those results, this section introduces <strong>the</strong> constraint crosslinguistically<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Agree/Case <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> it. The next section turns to <strong>the</strong> repairs.<br />
The PCC <strong>and</strong> its repair in French are illustrated in (118). Unfocussed pronouns<br />
must cliticize if <strong>the</strong>y are accusative DPs or in defective dative PPDATs,<br />
unlike if <strong>the</strong>y are in full PPs such as locative PPLOCs. The PCC bars<br />
1 st /2 nd /reflexive accusative clitic if a dative intervenes between v <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> direct object.<br />
Such dative interveners are applicative datives <strong>and</strong> dative clitics, ei<strong>the</strong>r basegenerated<br />
in this position, or moving through it. The PCC repair turns <strong>the</strong> defective<br />
dative PPDAT into a full PP that is virtually identical to <strong>the</strong> locative PPLOC, up<br />
to cliticizing as a locative clitic in some varieties (notated ¥ ). The full PP <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> repair<br />
has <strong>the</strong> syntactic properties <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r full PPs.<br />
(240) a. Lucille la/*nous leur présentera<br />
b. *Lucille *la/√nous présentera à elles<br />
c. ¥ *Lucille *la/√nous y présentera<br />
Lucille her/us.A <strong>the</strong>m.D/LOC will.introduce to <strong>the</strong>m<br />
Lucille will introduce her/us to <strong>the</strong>m.<br />
(French, chapter 4)<br />
The PCC <strong>and</strong> its repairs have long been known for Romance (Perlmutter<br />
1971, who compares Warlpiri), <strong>and</strong> individually for o<strong>the</strong>r languages such as<br />
Basque (Lafon 1980) <strong>and</strong> Georgian (Boeder 1968). It is <strong>the</strong> spectacular discovery<br />
<strong>of</strong> Bonet (1991) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> work that followed hers that <strong>the</strong>re a common constraint<br />
<strong>and</strong> dedicated repairs shared by languages <strong>of</strong> diverse character <strong>and</strong> affiliation:<br />
Shambala, Yimas, Warlpiri, Kambera, Ojibwa, <strong>and</strong> Mapudungun join French,<br />
Warlpiri, Basque, <strong>and</strong> Georgian in a long list (Albizu 1997ab, Haspelmath 2004).<br />
The PCC <strong>and</strong> its repairs are good c<strong>and</strong>idates for reflexes <strong>of</strong> universal principles.<br />
The <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> PCC adopted here may be called <strong>the</strong> Agree/Case approach.<br />
It seeks to subsume <strong>the</strong> PCC under locality on <strong>the</strong> system <strong>of</strong> phi-Agree <strong>and</strong> Case<br />
licensing in Chomsky (2000a), or <strong>the</strong> Agree/Case system (section 5.4). An<br />
Agree/Case locus, such as vACC, possesses uninterpretable phi-<strong>features</strong>, <strong>the</strong> probe.<br />
The probe seeks to establish a syntactic dependency, Agree, with matching interpretable<br />
phi-<strong>features</strong>, <strong>the</strong> goal. The interpretable phi-<strong>features</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> goal, in turn,<br />
need <strong>the</strong>mselves to be licensed by Agree, through Case assigned by <strong>the</strong> probe.<br />
Agree is subject to conditions, including locality that limits <strong>the</strong> probe to <strong>the</strong> closest<br />
matching goal. The leading idea <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Agree/Case approach to <strong>the</strong> PCC is that an<br />
applicative dative blocks Agree for [+person] φ-feature(s), leading to a Caselicensing<br />
failure (242)-(243). [+person] is borne in French by 1 st /2 nd <strong>and</strong> by <strong>the</strong><br />
special 3 rd person reflexive se, but not by 3 rd person accusatives; cross-linguistic<br />
variation on this matter, in (243), is discussed in chapter 6.