26.11.2012 Views

Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS

Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS

Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

structures that only occur in contexts where <strong>the</strong> PCC bars <strong>the</strong> usual ones, not o<strong>the</strong>rwise.<br />

Unfocussed pronoun datives in French must be clitics, save when <strong>the</strong> accusative<br />

is a 1 st /2 nd /reflexive clitic, <strong>and</strong> so it is for nonagreeing datives in Basque,<br />

ergative <strong>and</strong> accusative in Basque <strong>and</strong> Finnish unaccusatives, <strong>and</strong> so on.<br />

Table 4.1: PCC repairs<br />

Transitive Applicative (IO-O)<br />

Person-Case Constraint<br />

(α* banned iff [+person])<br />

Repair<br />

(bold element changes)<br />

French DATclitic-ACCclitic* ACC*-DATPP/LOCclitic<br />

(? DATSE(INH)-ACCclitic* DATSE(INH)-ACCstrong*)<br />

West. Basque DATagr-ABSagr* ABS-DATPP<br />

Georgian DATagr-ABS/ACCagr* ABS/ACC-DATPP<br />

DATagr-ABS/ACCagr* DATagr-[agr's self].ABS/ACC3SG*<br />

Unaccusative Applicative (IO-S)<br />

Basque (dial.) DATagr-ABSagr* ERGagr*-DATAppl<br />

Chinook ABSagr-ABSagr* ERGagr-ABSagr*<br />

Finnish OBLAppl-NOMagr* OBLAppl-ACC*<br />

Transitive (EA-S)<br />

Arizona Tewa bareagr-bareagr* ERGagr-bareagr*<br />

Yurok NOM-NOM* NOM-ACC*<br />

Legend: S unaccusative subject, EA transitive subject, O direct object, IO applicative object.<br />

Note: Yurok 1/2→2/1 combinations are NOM-NOM; see section 5.9.<br />

This is an unusual state <strong>of</strong> affairs for syntax. Ungrammatical structures do not<br />

usually come with repairs. When wh-movement is blocked, *Who did she see __<br />

<strong>and</strong> Ilmarinen? 'Who is such that she saw him <strong>and</strong> Ilmarinen', <strong>the</strong>re is no o<strong>the</strong>rwise<br />

unavailable structure that emerges into grammaticality as repair, *Who did<br />

she see him <strong>and</strong> Ilmarinen? Only independently available paraphrase can be used,<br />

Who did she see __ along with Ilmarinen? For <strong>the</strong> PCC, repairs do exist.<br />

Constructions in language after language are dedicated to that which <strong>the</strong> PCC<br />

bars. It might not be surprising for extrasyntactic domains to behave so.<br />

Morphology has superficial analogues <strong>of</strong> repairs discussed in chapter 2, like <strong>the</strong><br />

English comparative where more takes over just when an affixal –er is<br />

unavailable, quicker/*apter -- more apt/*quick. A principal result <strong>of</strong> this chapter is<br />

to establish <strong>the</strong> syntactic character <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> PCC <strong>and</strong> its repair in French, keeping <strong>the</strong><br />

mystery The intact. following sections draw on <strong>the</strong> relatively rich underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> syntax <strong>of</strong><br />

French to establish <strong>the</strong> properties <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> PCC <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> PCC repair in it:<br />

– Section 4.2 presents <strong>the</strong> background on clitics <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> relevant aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

applicative <strong>and</strong> prepositional syntax.<br />

87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!