26.11.2012 Views

Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS

Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS

Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

130<br />

Your reply to Jean-Jacques / *us was perfect.<br />

b. [Sa fidélité à ses parents / *eux] est bien connue.<br />

His devotion to his parents / *<strong>the</strong>m is well known.<br />

(Kayne 1975: 185)<br />

Adjectival <strong>and</strong> participial modifiers also do not have a cliticization site, save<br />

for past participles in Belgian French which permits une lettre [nous addressée] 'a<br />

letter us.D addressed' (Grevisse <strong>and</strong> Goosse 2008: 662b4°). Adjectives like redevable<br />

'indebted', destiné 'meant for', require an overt dative in <strong>the</strong> appropriate<br />

meaning, but an unfocussed pronoun cannot be realized, (203), (204).<br />

(203) a. Pour que les contraventions de Pauline sautent, il lui faudrait au moins<br />

un policier redevable à sa famille / *à elle.<br />

In order to get rid <strong>of</strong> Pauline's violations, she will need at least one policeman<br />

grateful to her family / *to her.<br />

b. Pour que nos contraventions sautent, il nous faudrait au moins un policier<br />

redevabale à notre équipe / *à nous.<br />

In order to get rid <strong>of</strong> our violations, we will need at least one policeman<br />

grateful to our team / *to us.<br />

(204) [L'aide destinée à vous tous / à VOUS / *à vous / *pour vous] est prête.<br />

<strong>the</strong> help intended to you all to YOU to you for you is ready<br />

(for à vous tous, see on modifiers below)<br />

DPs <strong>and</strong> AP modifiers are strong isl<strong>and</strong>s without a cliticization site. That leaves<br />

unfocussed pronoun datives without <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> cliticization, like <strong>the</strong> PCC,<br />

yet it does not license unfocussed strong pronouns.<br />

There are exceptions. Among <strong>the</strong> speakers surveyed here, all find <strong>the</strong> sharp ungrammaticality<br />

indicated in (203), but most judge 3 rd person unfocussed dative<br />

strong pronouns in reduced relatives like (205)a unproblematic. Postal (1990: 4.5)<br />

likewise finds this to be <strong>the</strong> sole context where strong pronoun datives are fine<br />

provided <strong>the</strong>y are not applicative, (205)b. 89 Also good are inanimates, (205)c, despite<br />

<strong>the</strong> general oddity <strong>of</strong> strong animate pronouns (Cardinaletti <strong>and</strong> Starke 1999,<br />

Zribi-Hertz 2000). 1 st /2 nd person pronouns remain to be properly investigated, but<br />

to <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>the</strong>y have been, <strong>the</strong>y are out even in reduced relatives, (204).<br />

(205) a. Qu<strong>and</strong> Ricardoi avait été élu directeur,<br />

When Ricardoi had been elected director,<br />

un ami [très attaché à luii] était venu nous parler.<br />

a friend [attached to him] came to speak to us.<br />

b. la voiture achetée à elle<br />

<strong>the</strong> car bought from her / *for her<br />

89 Postal does not control for focus here, but it remains that reduced relatives pattern with <strong>the</strong><br />

PCC repair against o<strong>the</strong>r non-PCC contexts, focus aside. His examples use only 3 rd person.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!