Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS
Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS
Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
214<br />
– Accusatives DPs need clausal Agree/Case licensing.<br />
– Pronouns have a prosodic Σ-deficiency. It is met within full PPs (<strong>and</strong> focussed<br />
DPs), where <strong>the</strong>y surface as strong, <strong>and</strong> CPs, where <strong>the</strong>y are clitics.<br />
– Full PPs like CPs are phases, with <strong>the</strong>ir own Agree/Case <strong>and</strong> Σ-licensing.<br />
A DP inside is inaccessible to clausal syntax, including Agree/Case, various<br />
binding phenomena, <strong>and</strong> applicative relationships like possessor.<br />
– Datives are defective PPDATs. They do not provide Σ-licensing <strong>and</strong> leave<br />
<strong>the</strong> DP visible to <strong>the</strong> clause for <strong>the</strong> relationships above, including to interfere<br />
in Agree for <strong>the</strong> PCC, although it cannot o<strong>the</strong>rwise value a phi-probe.<br />
– The PCC repair transforms <strong>the</strong> defective PPDAT to a full PP, (nearly) identical<br />
to <strong>the</strong> locative PP, differing from PPDAT only in completeness.<br />
In terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> present <strong>the</strong>ory phases, a PP with an Agree/Case system in its<br />
functional architecture is a phase, because it Agrees with its DP <strong>and</strong> Transfers.<br />
Phasehood will bring <strong>the</strong> opacity <strong>and</strong> autonomy characteristics <strong>of</strong> full PPs toge<strong>the</strong>r<br />
in a way discussed below. The addition <strong>of</strong> an Agree/Case system to <strong>the</strong> defective<br />
PPDAT turns it into <strong>the</strong> full PP phase, opaque <strong>and</strong> autonomous. It falls under ℜ if<br />
PDAT is a potential but not active Agree/Case locus for (293) (repeated).<br />
(293) ℜ (for Agree/Case): A uninterpretable feature (probe) may enter <strong>the</strong><br />
numeration on a potential Agree/Case locus if needed for Case-licensing.<br />
The PCC arises in <strong>the</strong> transitive vP when [person] Agree between v <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
direct object fails across PPDAT. This has been seen in (312) for vABS, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> outcome<br />
is <strong>the</strong> starting point <strong>of</strong> (333). All <strong>the</strong> elements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vP are at this point a<br />
single phase built from a single numeration. It includes PDAT <strong>and</strong> its complement,<br />
because <strong>the</strong> defective PDAT without a probe is not a phase head. However, it is a<br />
potential Agree/Case locus. Upon crash <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vP phase, ℜ (293) allows <strong>the</strong> addition<br />
<strong>of</strong> a phi-probe to this numeration. The sole locus for <strong>the</strong> addition is PDAT. The<br />
enriched P Agrees with its complement, <strong>and</strong> it is Transferred with deletion <strong>of</strong> its<br />
valued uninterpretable <strong>features</strong>. The remainder <strong>of</strong> a numeration rebuilds using <strong>the</strong><br />
Transferred PP. The interior <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> PP is now invisible to <strong>the</strong> clause <strong>and</strong> does not<br />
intervene in <strong>the</strong> Agree <strong>of</strong> vACC. No PCC arises, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> vP converges.<br />
(333) Derivation <strong>of</strong> full PP PCC repair in transitives<br />
a. v[π:+,#:,κ:A] … [P[κ:P] pron[π:3,#:PL,κ:(v?)]]DAT … O[π:1,#:PL,κ:]]] →*Transfer, ℜ<br />
b. [P[π/#:,κ:P] pron[π:3,#:PL,κ:]]full →P-Agree/Transfer<br />
c. v[π:,#:,κ:A] … [P[π/#:,κ:P] pron[π:3,#:PL,κ:P]]full … O[π:1,#:PL,κ:]]] →v-Agree<br />
d. v[π:1,#:PL,κ:A] … [P[π/#:,κ:P] pron[π:3,#:PL,κ:]]full … O[π:1,#:PL,κ:A]]] →√Transfer<br />
(Notation: π [person], # [number], κ [Case] (A acc.), + [+person] <strong>of</strong> DAT)