Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS
Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS
Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
speaker/addressee because <strong>the</strong> more specific 1 st person is compatible with only<br />
one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> values assumed by <strong>the</strong> pronoun. 177<br />
(366) Eachi <strong>of</strong> usj evaluates herselfi/<strong>the</strong>mselvesi/*ourselvesi/j (in ourj report).<br />
241<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r mismatch that might not need a syntax-interpretation divorce are illustrated<br />
in (368)-(370) Nunberg (2004a) argues that (367) involves <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> a context<br />
<strong>of</strong> such a granularity that among <strong>the</strong> properties <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> speaker is being <strong>the</strong><br />
condemned prisoner but not being John Doe, ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> 1 st person to refer<br />
to someone o<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> non-speaker. (368) may involve <strong>the</strong> speaker mentally<br />
putting herself or himself in <strong>the</strong> addressee's shoes, perhaps in <strong>the</strong> way proposed<br />
for one by Moltmann (2006), for empathy, deference, or ridicule <strong>of</strong> selfimportance.<br />
Metonymies like (369) <strong>and</strong> (370) also keep <strong>the</strong> 1 st person feature in<br />
interpretation, but transfer it or <strong>the</strong> predicate in various ways, discussed by<br />
Jackend<strong>of</strong>f (1992), Nunberg (1995, 2004b), Ward (2004), Kwon <strong>and</strong> Zribi-Hertz<br />
(2008).<br />
(367) Condemned prisoner: I am traditionally allowed to order whatever I want<br />
for my last meal. (i.e. The condemned prisoner is traditionally…)<br />
(368) Don't wek look nice in ourk new hat! But it's bit too large for youk.<br />
(369) We parked ourselves out back <strong>and</strong> (we) got a c<strong>of</strong>fee/#stolen.<br />
(370) I'm <strong>the</strong> ham s<strong>and</strong>wich <strong>and</strong> (I'm) ra<strong>the</strong>r satisfied/#tasty.<br />
There do exist mismatches where morphology <strong>and</strong> syntax do show phi-<strong>features</strong><br />
that ought not be <strong>the</strong>re in interpretation. Probably most familiar is <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> 2PL<br />
(French) or 3PL (German) for 2SG. However, it only affects <strong>the</strong> finite verb <strong>and</strong><br />
might be set aside as politeness marking or as emergence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> default (Wechsler<br />
2004, Sauerl<strong>and</strong> 2008). Wechsler <strong>and</strong> Zlatić (1998, 2000, 2003) discuss <strong>the</strong> more<br />
egregious number <strong>and</strong> gender mismatches in Table 6.1 that resist such analysis.<br />
They conclude that nouns may come with different phi-sets for different mechanisms.<br />
All may mismatch, as may be illustrated by <strong>the</strong> noun deća 'children':<br />
– Index phi-set, neuter plural, for subject-predicate <strong>and</strong> antecedent-pronoun<br />
matching (through phi-matching in Discourse Representation Structures).<br />
– Concord phi-set, feminine singular, for modifier <strong>and</strong> secondary predicate<br />
matching (through subcategorization in HPSG).<br />
– Semantic phi-set, e.g. masculine plural, that surfaces under redescription,<br />
including by a pronoun (through pragmatics).<br />
Table 6.1: Serbo-Croatian agreement mismatches<br />
177 Also illustrated in (366) is Sauerl<strong>and</strong>'s proposal that plural is underspecified, <strong>and</strong> so may refer<br />
to atoms to avoid <strong>the</strong> gender presuppositions associated with <strong>the</strong> more specified singular.