Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS
Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS
Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
112<br />
Rooryck (1988a) finds that even where for benefactives that may be àphrases,<br />
<strong>the</strong> possibility vanishes under various transformations such as direct object<br />
cliticization (but (167) is an exception). He proposes that benefactive àphrases<br />
are not in <strong>the</strong> same configuration as benefactive clitics, but involve ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />
ano<strong>the</strong>r use <strong>of</strong> à-phrases akin to 'for' adjuncts. Any such <strong>the</strong>ory that puts <strong>the</strong>m<br />
above <strong>the</strong> vP would exclude <strong>the</strong>m from creating <strong>the</strong> PCC in (167)b according to<br />
(121), making <strong>the</strong>m irrelevant to <strong>the</strong> PCC (cf. Cuervo 2003a: 4.2-3, Roberge <strong>and</strong><br />
Troberg 2009, <strong>and</strong> for a parallel in Warlpiri, Simpson 1983: 2.3.3.2). 76<br />
4.5.3 Causee datives<br />
The next two applicative kinds, causees <strong>and</strong> falloir-experiencers, show that applicative<br />
datives create <strong>the</strong> PCC whe<strong>the</strong>r clitic or à-phrases, in accord with (121).<br />
The causatives <strong>of</strong> interest belong to <strong>the</strong> cross-linguistically common type <strong>of</strong> restructuring<br />
causative in (168) (cf. Gibson <strong>and</strong> Raposo 1986, Guasti 2005). The<br />
causative <strong>and</strong> causativized verb form a single domain for Case, agreement, Amovement,<br />
<strong>and</strong> cliticization. The causee is dative if it is <strong>the</strong> external argument <strong>of</strong> a<br />
transitive, (168)a-d, accusative if <strong>the</strong> subject <strong>of</strong> an unaccusative or passive, (168)ef.<br />
All clitic arguments <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> embedded verb must climb into <strong>the</strong> matrix clause.<br />
Beside this causative st<strong>and</strong>s <strong>the</strong> ECM causative in (169), which behaves more like<br />
<strong>the</strong> ECM structures in English or French. The causee is accusative, <strong>and</strong> clitic arguments<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lower verb stay with it in <strong>the</strong> infinitive clause.<br />
(168) a. Azenor lui fait manger les gâteaux.<br />
b. Azenor fait manger les gâteaux à Nelson.<br />
c. Azenor lui les fait manger.<br />
d. Azenor les fait manger à Nelson.<br />
Azenor him.D <strong>the</strong>m.A makes eat <strong>the</strong> cakes to Nelson<br />
Azenor made him/Nelson eat <strong>the</strong> cakes.<br />
(restructuring causative <strong>of</strong> active transitive)<br />
e. Azenor fait manger les gâteaux (par Nelson).<br />
f. Azenor les fait manger par Nelson.<br />
Azenor <strong>the</strong>m.A makes eat <strong>the</strong> cakes by Nelson<br />
Azenor made <strong>the</strong> cakes be eaten (by Nelson).<br />
(restructuring causative <strong>of</strong> passive transitive)<br />
(169) a. Azenor (*les) laisse Nelson (les) manger (les gâteaux).<br />
Azenor lets Nelson eat <strong>the</strong> cakes/<strong>the</strong>m.A (les).<br />
b. Azenor le (*les) laisse (les) manger.<br />
Azenor lets him.A (le) eat <strong>the</strong>m.A (les).<br />
76 The matter is complicated by speaker variation: Rooryck (1988a: 384) contrasts with Postal<br />
(1990) on acheter, Postal (1990: 191 note 31) notes variation on reflexive benefactives, <strong>and</strong> M.<br />
Jouitteau (p.c.) differs from Postal (1990: 161f.) in allowing benefactives under conjunctive as<br />
much as comparative contrast (albeit not in reduced relatives, p. 151f., cf. (205)b).