Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2 Table of Contents 1 Modularity, phi-features, and repairs .......................................................9 1.1 Introduction .............................................................................................9 1.2 Modular architectures............................................................................12 1.3 Phi-features across modules ..................................................................18 1.4 Repairs at the interface ..........................................................................26 2 Phi-features in realizational morphology................................................28 2.1 Modularity, morphology, and phi-features............................................28 2.2 Opaque cliticization and agreement ......................................................37 2.3 Gaps and synthetic-analytic alternations ...............................................48 2.4 The limits of a modular signature..........................................................54 3 Person hierarchy interactions in syntax..................................................58 3.1 Person hierarchies and person interactions............................................58 3.2 PH-interactions in Ojibwa and Mapudungun ........................................60 3.3 Theories of PH-interactions...................................................................70 3.4 PH-interactions and repairs in Tanoan ..................................................73 3.5 The limits of syntactic PH-interactions .................................................79 4 Person Case Constraint repairs in French..............................................82 4.1 Introduction ...........................................................................................82 4.2 French clitics .........................................................................................88 4.3 The PCC repair and the Cliticization Requirement ...............................96 4.4 The syntactic character of the repair....................................................103 4.4.1 Introduction .................................................................................103 4.4.2 Floating quantifiers......................................................................104 4.4.3 Condition B .................................................................................105 4.4.4 Right dislocation..........................................................................108 4.4.5 Phi-agreement..............................................................................108 4.4.6 Overview .....................................................................................109 4.5 Applicative datives ..............................................................................109 4.5.1 Introduction .................................................................................109 4.5.2 Possessive, dessus, and benefactive datives ................................111 4.5.3 Causee datives .............................................................................112 4.5.4 Connaître-class causee datives....................................................118 4.5.5 Experiencer datives .....................................................................119 4.5.6 Overview .....................................................................................120 4.6 Irreparable problems............................................................................121 4.6.1 Introduction .................................................................................121 4.6.2 Multiple dative clitics ..................................................................122
4.6.3 Arbitrary clitic cluster gaps .........................................................123 4.6.4 Mediopassive se + dative clitic....................................................124 4.6.5 Datives in DPs and APs...............................................................129 4.6.6 Coordination and modification ....................................................131 4.6.7 Datives in causatives ...................................................................134 4.6.8 The weak PCC.............................................................................136 4.6.9 Overview .....................................................................................138 4.7 The PCC, the repairs, and the nature of datives...................................139 4.8 Appendix A: Exceptional Case Marking.............................................146 4.9 Appendix B: Datives in PCC contexts.................................................151 5 Repairs and uninterpretable features....................................................153 5.1 Introduction .........................................................................................153 5.2 The Person Case Constraint.................................................................156 5.2.1 The Agree/Case approach............................................................156 5.2.2 Intervention..................................................................................159 5.2.3 Agreement, Case, Licensing ........................................................163 5.2.4 Datives.........................................................................................166 5.2.5 Overview .....................................................................................168 5.3 The repairs of the Person Case Constraint...........................................169 5.3.1 The character of the repairs .........................................................169 5.3.2 The choice of mechanisms...........................................................171 5.3.3 Global mechanisms......................................................................174 5.4 The Minimalist Program: uninterpretability, interfaces, and repairs ...176 5.4.1 Uninterpretable features: phi, Case, and Agree ...........................176 5.4.2 The interface algorithm ℜ ...........................................................182 5.4.3 Phase theory.................................................................................186 5.5 Dependent Case as last-resort..............................................................188 5.6 Unaccusative repairs: Transitivization.................................................197 5.6.1 Introduction .................................................................................197 5.6.2 Basque .........................................................................................198 5.6.3 Chinook .......................................................................................202 5.6.4 Finnish .........................................................................................206 5.6.5 Overview .....................................................................................212 5.7 Transitive repairs: Strengthening the PP .............................................212 5.8 Transitive repairs: Strengthening the DP.............................................219 5.9 Conclusion: The scope and limits of ℜ ...............................................225 5.9.1 Aspects of ℜ................................................................................225 5.9.2 Person and Case licensing ...........................................................228 5.9.3 Licensing, Full Interpretation, and ℜ ..........................................232 6 Phi in syntax and phi interpretation......................................................237 6.1 Phi-alphabets .......................................................................................237 6.2 Syntactic and interpretive phi-mismatches ..........................................239 3
Page 1: Title: Phi-features and the Modular
Page 5 and 6: Conventions and glosses Cross-refer
Page 7 and 8: Preface This work uses phi-features
Page 9 and 10: 1 Modularity, phi-features, and rep
Page 11 and 12: (4) a. Irati-rii nesk-ak/*ekk gusta
Page 13 and 14: Lyer illusion, a line terminating i
Page 15 and 16: Lexicon This simple model may be en
Page 17 and 18: (12) As far as Johni is concerned,
Page 19 and 20: (18) a. *(Some goatsi) seemi/*seems
Page 21 and 22: Uninterpretable phenomena should no
Page 23 and 24: d. There were shown (*her) to be fi
Page 25 and 26: able features, and ultimately expli
Page 27 and 28: 1997, Yang 1997, Jacobson 1997, Fra
Page 29 and 30: Syntax: syntactic but not properly
Page 31 and 32: (44) Morphology-free syntax: Syntax
Page 33 and 34: (Distributed Morphology) (49) a. Sy
Page 35 and 36: In Aronoff's example, it may be eas
Page 37 and 38: (53) v dolea/zákonub/kolec/máled/
Page 39 and 40: a. 3SG/PL.DAT le/les + 3SGM/3SGF/3P
Page 41 and 42: (62) a. Elle*x∈i lai/∅i lui a d
Page 43 and 44: Morphology might also need devices
Page 45 and 46: agreement exponent maps to another
Page 47 and 48: singular or 1 st /2 nd person plura
Page 49 and 50: frire 'fry' (e.g. 1PL *frions vs. r
Page 51 and 52: domains. The well-studied English c
Page 53 and 54:
not cross this distance, just as in
Page 55 and 56:
There are more robust cases of appa
Page 57 and 58:
ecause then there is no crossing of
Page 59 and 60:
(85) a. n-waabm-aa b. n-waabm-ig c.
Page 61 and 62:
2- go.home go.home 2SG.SU he goes h
Page 63 and 64:
sion is that EA and O PH-interactio
Page 65 and 66:
(92) a. [DP Johni 'sD° [IP PROi no
Page 67 and 68:
uci-maceha-t [mesq mace-ntu]]. from
Page 69 and 70:
see her, PRO to see her, your/you s
Page 71 and 72:
)movement (Nichols 2001, cf. chapte
Page 73 and 74:
distribution of inverse morphemes i
Page 75 and 76:
. No direct-like version with 3EA
Page 77 and 78:
suppose that its oblique EA does no
Page 79 and 80:
fact. Thus the oblique-like EA of i
Page 81 and 82:
movement through probes for individ
Page 83 and 84:
digm (114) reveals the exception to
Page 85 and 86:
Lucille her/you.A them.D/LOC will.i
Page 87 and 88:
structures that only occur in conte
Page 89 and 90:
1PL nous no-tre/s nous, on nous 2PL
Page 91 and 92:
(126) a. Il lesi (lui) a dit-esi. H
Page 93 and 94:
(130) a. Je connais cette fillei. J
Page 95 and 96:
cliticization may take place, as fu
Page 97 and 98:
(134) a. Pourquoi est-ce que Jean p
Page 99 and 100:
(137) a. [Film synopsis:] L'étrang
Page 101 and 102:
101 seen in section 4.5. Thus the P
Page 103 and 104:
103 To sum up this section, the PCC
Page 105 and 106:
Dative clitics continue to license
Page 107 and 108:
107 These possibilities can be cont
Page 109 and 110:
4.4.6 Overview 109 The syntax and i
Page 111 and 112:
4.5.2 Possessive, dessus, and benef
Page 113 and 114:
c. Azenor les laisse être mangés
Page 115 and 116:
115 Pierre will.make SE.D buy a wat
Page 117 and 118:
117 arise through the intervention
Page 119 and 120:
119 The causee of the connaître-cl
Page 121 and 122:
121 The syntactic character of the
Page 123 and 124:
123 Paul seems to her to be unpleas
Page 125 and 126:
125 *sans se leur en prendre. sans
Page 127 and 128:
127 a. aux agriculteurs de vos rég
Page 129 and 130:
4.6.5 Datives in DPs and APs 129 Th
Page 131 and 132:
131 c. L'infinitifi […] a été t
Page 133 and 134:
133 (210) a. Elle photographiait *v
Page 135 and 136:
135 These peoplei are going to be q
Page 137 and 138:
137 1/2.ACC DAT clusters. Thus, the
Page 139 and 140:
139 tic doubling allows unfocussed
Page 141 and 142:
141 This view of the PCC repair ori
Page 143 and 144:
143 of French unfocussed pronouns.
Page 145 and 146:
145 the possessum (section 4.5). Al
Page 147 and 148:
147 When such adjectives are embedd
Page 149 and 150:
legitimate in ECM but not elsewhere
Page 151 and 152:
151 These are very tentative sugges
Page 153 and 154:
5 Repairs and uninterpretable featu
Page 155 and 156:
155 terpretation, not problems that
Page 157 and 158:
157 (241) Person Case Constraint (A
Page 159 and 160:
5.2.2 Intervention 159 In the Agree
Page 161 and 162:
161 (Etxepare and Oyharçabal 2008a
Page 163 and 164:
tive within the TP, the PCC disappe
Page 165 and 166:
165 you.ABS visit-ing liking R.3sAi
Page 167 and 168:
167 - It is unclear whether dative
Page 169 and 170:
169 PCC are tied up with this issue
Page 171 and 172:
5.3.2 The choice of mechanisms The
Page 173 and 174:
(264) [DATapplicative [v+P[+person:
Page 175 and 176:
175 some structure always wins the
Page 177 and 178:
177 distinct from syntax and from e
Page 179 and 180:
179 These observations do not mean
Page 181 and 182:
may also lead to the (re-)Merge of
Page 183 and 184:
183 (279) Numeration: The numeratio
Page 185 and 186:
185 they lead to ineffability. Vari
Page 187 and 188:
187 distinction between valued unin
Page 189 and 190:
189 she believed to.have been bough
Page 191 and 192:
girls-ERG tired R.3pA-that seem R.3
Page 193 and 194:
193 To integrate dependent Case, di
Page 195 and 196:
195 depends on what other probes ex
Page 197 and 198:
197 b. She vacc+showed (*the studen
Page 199 and 200:
199 The structures of interest for
Page 201 and 202:
201 (Basque, Tolosa T1, Rezac 2008c
Page 203 and 204:
203 (313) (i-kalai) ga-či-łj-(a)
Page 205 and 206:
205 with it (Rezac 2006: 3.7, 2008b
Page 207 and 208:
207 agreement (Holmberg 2005, Holmb
Page 209 and 210:
209 of Icelandic and Finnish, not n
Page 211 and 212:
211 (329) Minu-ni täyty-y ti men-n
Page 213 and 214:
stead in Table 5.3. The dative inte
Page 215 and 216:
215 This application of ℜ has som
Page 217 and 218:
217 with cliticization alone. This
Page 219 and 220:
219 serve in the applicative constr
Page 221 and 222:
221 way. IOs must normally be appli
Page 223 and 224:
223 The facility of modeling both r
Page 225 and 226:
y ℜ in the same way as that of PP
Page 227 and 228:
227 of the target, goal, and the pa
Page 229 and 230:
229 tives, the relationship of EA-O
Page 231 and 232:
231 Pesetsky and Torrego forthc, Wi
Page 233 and 234:
233 For an important class of synta
Page 235 and 236:
235 The conditions on these depende
Page 237 and 238:
6 Phi in syntax and phi interpretat
Page 239 and 240:
239 predicate-argument relations, d
Page 241 and 242:
speaker/addressee because the more
Page 243 and 244:
243 The second point illustrated by
Page 245 and 246:
245 The quasi-existential on in (37
Page 247 and 248:
247 Everywhere onei (on) presents o
Page 249 and 250:
249 *[Marie and I] found.3PL themse
Page 251 and 252:
251 to Agree by locality, if it wer
Page 253 and 254:
- Albizu (1997b, cf. 1997a): A pers
Page 255 and 256:
255 of 3 rd person. This is so even
Page 257 and 258:
257 of diachrony and grammaticaliza
Page 259 and 260:
259 tain configurations like (385),
Page 261 and 262:
person 'impostors' for the speaker/
Page 263 and 264:
263 like invite, which do not. The
Page 265 and 266:
265 sions and eliminations of a mor
Page 267 and 268:
267 featural relationships in synta
Page 269 and 270:
269 Carruthers, Peter, Stephen Laur
Page 271 and 272:
271 Moravcsik, Edith A. 1978. Agree
Page 273 and 274:
7.2 Chapter 2 273 Ackema, Peter, an
Page 275 and 276:
275 De Crousaz, Isabelle, and Ur Sh
Page 277 and 278:
277 Luís, Ana R., and Andrew Spenc
Page 279 and 280:
279 Szendrői, Kriszta. 2005. Focus
Page 281 and 282:
281 Bobaljik, Jonathan David, and P
Page 283 and 284:
283 Rosen, Carol. 1990. Rethinking
Page 285 and 286:
285 Bianchi, Valentina. 1999. Conse
Page 287 and 288:
287 Fauconnier, Gilles. 1983. Gener
Page 289 and 290:
289 Legendre, Geraldine. 1989a. Inv
Page 291 and 292:
291 Rezac, Milan. 2010a. Ineffabili
Page 293 and 294:
7.5 Chapter 5 293 Abels, Klaus. 200
Page 295 and 296:
295 Bobaljik, Jonathan David, and P
Page 297 and 298:
297 Den Dikken, Marcel. 2001. 'Plur
Page 299 and 300:
299 Holmberg, Anders, and Christer
Page 301 and 302:
301 McCreight, Katherine. 1988. Mul
Page 303 and 304:
303 Rezac, Milan. 2008c. The syntax
Page 305 and 306:
305 Vainikka, Anne Marjatta. 1989.
Page 307 and 308:
307 Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia. 2003
Page 309 and 310:
309 Landau, Idan. 2000. Elements of
Page 311:
311 Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann.
show all

Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of - UMR 7023 - CNRS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?