04.03.2014 Aufrufe

Download gesamtes Buch: 206 S., PDF-File 4552 MB - Internetloge.de

Download gesamtes Buch: 206 S., PDF-File 4552 MB - Internetloge.de

Download gesamtes Buch: 206 S., PDF-File 4552 MB - Internetloge.de

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen

Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.

Die Rolle <strong>de</strong>r Sprache<br />

Die wesentlichste philosophische Entwicklung im 20. Jhd. war in <strong>de</strong>n Augen<br />

<strong>de</strong>r Transzen<strong>de</strong>ntalpragmatik <strong>de</strong>r „linguistic turn“ 50 , also <strong>de</strong>r Durchbruch <strong>de</strong>r<br />

50 F.N. S.P.: Apel verarbeitet hierbei gründlich die Ansätze Charles S. Peirce<br />

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_S._Peirce ). Peirce entwickelte z.B.<br />

folgen<strong>de</strong> Tafel <strong>de</strong>r Kategorien:<br />

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categories_(Peirce)<br />

Peirce arrived at his own system of three categories after a thoroughgoing study of his<br />

pre<strong>de</strong>cessors, with special reference to the categories of Aristotle, Kant, and Hegel.<br />

The names that he used for his own categories varied with context and occasion, but<br />

ranged from reasonably intuitive terms like quality, reaction, and representation to<br />

maximally abstract terms like firstness, secondness, and thirdness, respectively. Taken<br />

in full generality, nth-ness can be un<strong>de</strong>rstood as referring to those properties that all<br />

n-adic relations have in common. Peirce's distinctive claim is that a type hierarchy of<br />

three levels is generative of all that we need in logic.<br />

Part of the justification for Peirce's claim that three categories are both necessary and<br />

sufficient appears to arise from mathematical i<strong>de</strong>as about the reducibility of n-adic<br />

relations. According to Peirce's Reduction Thesis, (a) triads are necessary because<br />

genuinely triadic relations cannot be completely analyzed in terms or monadic and<br />

dyadic predicates, and (b) triads are sufficient because there are no genuinely tetradic<br />

or larger polyadic relations -- all higher-arity n-adic relations can be analyzed in terms<br />

of triadic and lower-arity relations. Others have offered proofs of the Reduction Thesis.<br />

Peirce introduces his Categories and their theory in "On a New List of Categories"<br />

(1867), a work which is cast as a Kantian <strong>de</strong>duction and is short but <strong>de</strong>nse and difficult<br />

to summarize. The following table is compiled from that and later works.<br />

Peirce's Categories (technical name: the cenopythagorean categories [5] )<br />

Name:<br />

Firstness.<br />

Secondness.<br />

Thirdness.<br />

Typical<br />

characterization:<br />

Quality of<br />

feeling.<br />

As universe<br />

of<br />

experience:<br />

I<strong>de</strong>as,<br />

chance,<br />

possibility.<br />

As quantity: Technical<br />

<strong>de</strong>finition:<br />

Vagueness,<br />

"some".<br />

Reaction,<br />

Brute facts, Singularity,<br />

resistance,<br />

actuality. discreteness.<br />

(dyadic) relation.<br />

Representation.<br />

Habits,<br />

laws,<br />

necessity.<br />

Generality,<br />

continuity.<br />

Reference to<br />

a ground (a<br />

ground is a<br />

pure<br />

abstraction of<br />

a quality).<br />

Reference to<br />

a correlate<br />

(by its<br />

relate).<br />

Reference to<br />

an<br />

interpretant*.<br />

Valence,<br />

"adicity":<br />

Essentially<br />

monadic (the<br />

quale, in the<br />

sense of the<br />

thing with the<br />

quality).<br />

Essentially<br />

dyadic (the<br />

relate and the<br />

correlate).<br />

Essentially<br />

triadic (sign,<br />

object,<br />

interpretant*).<br />

*Note: An interpretant is the product of an interpretive process, or the content of an<br />

interpretation. The context for interpretants is not psychology or sociology, but instead<br />

philosophical logic. In a sense, an interpretant is whatever can be un<strong>de</strong>rstood as a<br />

106

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!