10.04.2013 Views

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

82 IMMEDIATE INFERENCE.<br />

the geometrical converse. The geometrical converse is<br />

the simple converse <strong>of</strong> an A proposition, and it is not<br />

<strong>logic</strong>ally inferrible from the l<strong>at</strong>ter, but has to be proved<br />

independently. Thus the geometrical converse <strong>of</strong><br />

&quot;<br />

all<br />

equil<strong>at</strong>eral triangles are &quot;<br />

equiangular is<br />

&quot;<br />

all equiangular<br />

triangles are equil<strong>at</strong>eral.&quot; In every case it will be found<br />

th<strong>at</strong> an independent pro<strong>of</strong> is necessary for the geomet<br />

rical converse. Euclid usually adopts the indirect pro<strong>of</strong>,<br />

by reductio ad absurdum (as in I. Prop, vi., &c.),<br />

in the<br />

course <strong>of</strong> which the truth <strong>of</strong> the original proposition is<br />

appealed to.<br />

We now add some examples illustr<strong>at</strong>ing the process <strong>of</strong><br />

conversion. Every proposition to be converted must first be<br />

reduced to strict <strong>logic</strong>al form.<br />

(1) &quot;There is no excellent beauty th<strong>at</strong> h<strong>at</strong>h not some<br />

strangeness in the proportion.&quot;<br />

(a) Excellent beauty<br />

(b) [a thing] without strangeness in the proportion ;<br />

1<br />

(c) denied <strong>of</strong> every instance <strong>of</strong> the subject.<br />

&quot; No excellent beauty is a thing without<br />

Hence SeP,<br />

strangeness in the proportion.&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

Converse PeS, Nothing without strangeness in the pro<br />

portion is excellent beauty.&quot;<br />

(2)<br />

&quot;<br />

It is a poor centre <strong>of</strong> a man s actions, himself.&quot;<br />

(a) A man s self<br />

(b) a poor centre <strong>of</strong> his actions ;<br />

(c) affirmed <strong>of</strong> every case <strong>of</strong> the subject.<br />

Hence SaP, &quot;A man s self in every case is a poor centre<br />

<strong>of</strong> his actions.&quot;<br />

Converse PiS, &quot;Something which is a poor centre <strong>of</strong> a<br />

man s actions is himself.&quot;<br />

(3) &quot;Mercy but murders, pardoning [/&amp;gt;.,<br />

those th<strong>at</strong> kill.&quot;<br />

(a) Mercy which pardons those th<strong>at</strong> kill<br />

(b) a murderous thing ;<br />

(&amp;lt;r)<br />

affirmed <strong>of</strong> every instance <strong>of</strong> the subject.<br />

For the proper order <strong>of</strong> <strong>logic</strong>al analysis see 4.<br />

if it pardons]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!