10.04.2013 Views

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

52<br />

THE LOGICAL PROPOSITION.<br />

we make an assertion we must either (i) affirm some<br />

thing <strong>of</strong> the subject we speak <strong>of</strong>, or (2) deny something<br />

<strong>of</strong> it. Again, the affirm<strong>at</strong>ion or denial may be made<br />

(a) <strong>of</strong> some one particular thing, or (b) <strong>of</strong> a whole class<br />

or kind <strong>of</strong> things, or (c) <strong>of</strong> a part <strong>of</strong> such a class, or (d)<br />

the proposition may be expressed without saying whether<br />

the whole or a part is meant. L<strong>at</strong>er <strong>logic</strong>ians called the<br />

former division (affirm<strong>at</strong>ive and neg<strong>at</strong>ive) one <strong>of</strong> quality,<br />

and the l<strong>at</strong>ter (which is concerned with the distinction<br />

<strong>of</strong> the part and the whole <strong>of</strong> a class) one <strong>of</strong> quantity.<br />

According to quality, then, propositions<br />

are either<br />

affirm<strong>at</strong>ive or neg<strong>at</strong>ive. Aristotle is fond <strong>of</strong> saying<br />

th<strong>at</strong> the affirm<strong>at</strong>ive unites or combines, the neg<strong>at</strong>ive<br />

divides or separ<strong>at</strong>es. Wh<strong>at</strong> kind <strong>of</strong> union, or separa<br />

tion, does the proposition express? The affirm<strong>at</strong>ive<br />

expresses a union between Subject and Predic<strong>at</strong>e in the<br />

sense th<strong>at</strong> the <strong>at</strong>tributes signified by the predic<strong>at</strong>e be<br />

long to the subject : thus in the proposition<br />

&quot;<br />

Fixed<br />

stars are self-luminous,&quot; the quality <strong>of</strong> shining by their<br />

own light is said to belong to the heavenly bodies called<br />

fixed stars. The neg<strong>at</strong>ive expresses a separ<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong><br />

subject and predic<strong>at</strong>e<br />

in the sense th<strong>at</strong> the <strong>at</strong>tributes<br />

signified by the predic<strong>at</strong>e do not belong to the subject ;<br />

&quot;<br />

gold is not easily fusible,&quot; declares th<strong>at</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong><br />

being easily fusible does not belong to gold. The<br />

typical forms, in Logic, <strong>of</strong> affirm<strong>at</strong>ion and neg<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

are S is P, S is not P. The student should bear in<br />

mind th<strong>at</strong> in this formal expression <strong>of</strong> the neg<strong>at</strong>ive pro<br />

position, the word<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

not belongs to the copula l :<br />

Subject Copula Predic<strong>at</strong>e<br />

S is not P<br />

1 The philosophical aspects <strong>of</strong> Neg<strong>at</strong>ion will be further considered<br />

in ch. XI. 5.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!