10.04.2013 Views

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DEFINITION. 173<br />

be familiar to other minds. The nearest genus {genus proximuiri)<br />

is referred to because then a simpler specific difference<br />

is sufficient to distinguish the object from th<strong>at</strong> genus.<br />

So far, we have tre<strong>at</strong>ed definition only as a means <strong>of</strong><br />

marking <strong>of</strong>f an object from others ; and this is the etymo<br />

<strong>logic</strong>al meaning <strong>of</strong> the term (definitio, opos, opicr^os}. The<br />

definitions with which we begin an inquiry, in any branch<br />

<strong>of</strong> knowledge, must be <strong>of</strong> this kind ; and wh<strong>at</strong>ever breadth<br />

and depth may be given<br />

not the beginning <strong>of</strong> the inquiry<br />

to the definition afterwards is<br />

but the result <strong>of</strong> it. Ob<br />

viously it is <strong>of</strong> gre<strong>at</strong> importance, <strong>at</strong> the beginning <strong>of</strong> some<br />

theoretical or practical discussion about a certain m<strong>at</strong>ter,<br />

th<strong>at</strong> we should be able to mark it <strong>of</strong>f by characteristics which<br />

are precise and easy to find. At first this is <strong>of</strong> more con<br />

sequence than any reference to characteristics which are<br />

scientifically more pr<strong>of</strong>ound. In scientific tre<strong>at</strong>ises we<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten find objects referred to by properties which are com<br />

par<strong>at</strong>ively unimportant but not easily mistaken.<br />

5. The following rules for the expression<br />

and for<br />

mul<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> definitions are based on those given by<br />

Aristotle.<br />

(i) The fundamental rule is th<strong>at</strong> the definition must<br />

st<strong>at</strong>e the most essential fe<strong>at</strong>ures <strong>of</strong> the objects to which<br />

the term is applicable.<br />

Aristotle considered th<strong>at</strong> the definition per genus et<br />

differentiam secured the st<strong>at</strong>ement <strong>of</strong> the essential<br />

fe<strong>at</strong>ures. But from the modern point <strong>of</strong> view this is<br />

not so. We have seen th<strong>at</strong> such definition may be<br />

nothing more than a preliminary survey <strong>of</strong> the ground.<br />

From the modern point <strong>of</strong> view, also, Aristotle made<br />

too complete a separ<strong>at</strong>ion between the &quot;essential&quot; and<br />

the<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

accidental qualities <strong>of</strong> objects. For the present<br />

we may say th<strong>at</strong> the essential qualities are those without<br />

which the thing could not be wh<strong>at</strong> it is. A man, for<br />

instance, by living alone for years on a deserted island,<br />

might lose the essential qualities <strong>of</strong> manhood and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!