10.04.2013 Views

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IMPORT OF PROPOSITIONS AND JUDGMENTS. 1O7<br />

tains some has a neg<strong>at</strong>ive proposition as its secondary<br />

implic<strong>at</strong>ion. For example, take the proposition<br />

&quot;<br />

all<br />

men are some animals,&quot; represented in fig. 14. It im<br />

plies th<strong>at</strong> there are other animals than men e.g., lions,<br />

in other words<br />

&quot; no men are some animals<br />

tigers, &c. ;<br />

(i.e., lions, tigers, &c.).&quot; Th<strong>at</strong> is, Hamilton s A pro<br />

position implies rj ; they are not independent forms.<br />

In a similar way we may show th<strong>at</strong> Hamilton s Y<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

some elements are all metals<br />

proposition e.g.,<br />

(fig.<br />

15) implies O, &quot;some elements are no metals.&quot; These<br />

also are not independent forms.<br />

The proposition w is peculiarly useless, for it is<br />

comp<strong>at</strong>ible with each <strong>of</strong> the five diagrams already given ;<br />

equil<strong>at</strong>eral<br />

Tnarujles<br />

ami<br />

equiangular<br />

iriancjks<br />

Fig. 14. Fig. 15- i Fig. 6.<br />

it is thus comp<strong>at</strong>ible with U, unless S and P are the<br />

names <strong>of</strong> an individual (and therefore <strong>logic</strong>ally<br />

divisible) object. This seems paradoxical ; hence we<br />

must show it in detail. Let S and P be both<br />

names <strong>of</strong> classes. The proposition U says th<strong>at</strong> &quot;all S<br />

is all P,&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

all equil<strong>at</strong>eral triangles are all equiangular<br />

&quot;<br />

triangles (fig. 1 6).<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

Now some means only a &quot;<br />

part ;<br />

and hence, if we divide the circle which represents the<br />

coincident classes into any two separ<strong>at</strong>e portions, or<br />

mark <strong>of</strong>f two separ<strong>at</strong>e smaller parts within it by smaller<br />

circles, we may call one part,<br />

and the other, &quot;some equiangular triangles&quot;; and it will<br />

be true th<strong>at</strong><br />

&quot;<br />

some equil<strong>at</strong>eral triangles are not some<br />

in<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

some equil<strong>at</strong>eral triangles

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!