10.04.2013 Views

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DEFINITION. 183<br />

the gre<strong>at</strong>est number <strong>of</strong> other characters, we observe th<strong>at</strong><br />

such a classific<strong>at</strong>ion s<strong>at</strong>isfies the following conditions :<br />

(a) It shall enable the gre<strong>at</strong>est number <strong>of</strong> general<br />

assertions to be made about the class.<br />

(b) It shall enable us to infer <strong>of</strong> any other member<br />

a gre<strong>at</strong> part <strong>of</strong> wh<strong>at</strong> we know about any one.<br />

(c)<br />

Its members shall have the gre<strong>at</strong>est number <strong>of</strong><br />

points <strong>of</strong> mutual resemblance, and the fewest<br />

points<br />

<strong>of</strong> resemblance to members <strong>of</strong> other<br />

groups.<br />

Such a class is said to be n<strong>at</strong>ural. This term, as<br />

used <strong>of</strong> classes, takes us back to the ancient view, th<strong>at</strong><br />

in N<strong>at</strong>ure there are fixed, permanent kinds or classes <strong>of</strong><br />

things which can never pass into one another. This<br />

idea is now abandoned, although we may retain the term<br />

&quot;n<strong>at</strong>ural&quot; as applied to methods <strong>of</strong> classific<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

The impossibility<br />

<strong>of</strong> drawing any clear dividing line is a<br />

fact <strong>of</strong> universal experience. &quot;To admit <strong>of</strong> degrees is the<br />

character <strong>of</strong> all n<strong>at</strong>ural facts ; there are no hard lines in<br />

n<strong>at</strong>ure. Between the animal and the vegetable kingdoms,<br />

for example, where is the line to he drawn? ... I reply<br />

th<strong>at</strong> I do not believe th<strong>at</strong> there is any absolute distinction<br />

wh<strong>at</strong>ever. External objects and events shade <strong>of</strong>f into one<br />

another by imperceptible differences ; and, consequently,<br />

definitions whose aim it is to classify such objects and<br />

events must <strong>of</strong> necessity be founded on circumstances par<br />

taking <strong>of</strong> this character. ... It is, therefore, no valid<br />

objection to a classific<strong>at</strong>ion, nor, consequently, to the defini<br />

be found which<br />

tion founded upon it, th<strong>at</strong> instances may<br />

fall, or seem to fall, on our lines <strong>of</strong> demarc<strong>at</strong>ion. This is<br />

inevitable in the n<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> things. But, this notwithstand<br />

ing, the classific<strong>at</strong>ion, and therefore the definition, is a good<br />

one if in those instances which do not fall on the line, the<br />

distinctions marked by<br />

the definition are such as it is<br />

important to mark, such th<strong>at</strong> the recognition <strong>of</strong> them will<br />

help the inquirer forward towards the desider<strong>at</strong>ed goal&quot;<br />

(Cairnes, Logical Method <strong>of</strong> Political Economy, p. 139).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!