10.04.2013 Views

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6 THE GENERAL AIM OF LOGIC.<br />

tion and explan<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> N<strong>at</strong>ure. In this work inquiry<br />

into principles <strong>of</strong> scientific method Roger Bacon<br />

(1214-1294) was a brilliant forerunner <strong>of</strong> writers much<br />

l<strong>at</strong>er in d<strong>at</strong>e. Francis Bacon, the Chancellor, carried<br />

on the work, and wrote his Novum Organum in rivalry<br />

with wh<strong>at</strong> he thought was the Aristotelian system <strong>of</strong> Logic.<br />

It was n<strong>at</strong>ural th<strong>at</strong> as this seemed to be a new beginning<br />

in Logic, a new name should be found for it ;<br />

and during<br />

Inductive Logic,&quot; as it is called,<br />

&quot;<br />

the nineteenth century,<br />

has received much <strong>at</strong>tention. The most important works<br />

in which it has been developed are those <strong>of</strong> Herschel,<br />

Whewell, and John Stuart Mill.<br />

Hence the usual tre<strong>at</strong>ment <strong>of</strong> Logic lays out the subject<br />

in two branches. The first <strong>of</strong> these is founded on the Logicwhich<br />

the mediaeval writers developed out <strong>of</strong> such acquaint<br />

ance with Aristotle as they possessed. This is usually called<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

Deductive Logic<br />

or<br />

&quot;<br />

Formal Logic.&quot; The second<br />

&quot;<br />

division is the Inductive Logic&quot; <strong>of</strong> which we have spoken,<br />

which is <strong>of</strong>ten called<br />

&quot;<br />

M<strong>at</strong>erial Logic.&quot; So far as the dis<br />

tinction implies a difference in principle between the two<br />

kinds <strong>of</strong> knowledge,<br />

it has no found<strong>at</strong>ion in the facts <strong>of</strong><br />

thought ; otherwise, there are advantages in not departing<br />

from it. 1<br />

4. Logic has to consider Language ; but only so<br />

far as differences <strong>of</strong> expression in language are the<br />

embodiment <strong>of</strong> differences <strong>of</strong> type in the process <strong>of</strong><br />

thought. The word X6yo&amp;lt;s had a double meaning in<br />

Greek : (a) the thought^ (/&amp;gt;) the word (or r<strong>at</strong>her, phrase<br />

or sentence) which is the expression <strong>of</strong> the thought,<br />

r<strong>at</strong>io and or<strong>at</strong>io. Aristotle distinguished these, calling<br />

the former TOV lo-co, TOV lv and the l<strong>at</strong>ter<br />

rfj TOV tn&amp;gt;<br />

i/o^??, ;<br />

the<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

inward and the<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

outward<br />

logos. This am<br />

biguity has given rise to a dispute as to whether Logic<br />

1 The recent philosophical development <strong>of</strong> Logic will be re<br />

ferred to in our concluding chapter, I.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!