10.04.2013 Views

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

150<br />

MEDIATE INFERENCE<br />

The first s in thej name indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> the original minor<br />

premise is to be converted simply ; the m indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> the<br />

original premises are to be transposed. The C indic<strong>at</strong>es<br />

th<strong>at</strong> from the new pair <strong>of</strong> premises, thus obtained, we are<br />

and the second<br />

to draw the conclusion in i.<br />

Celarent, fig. ;<br />

s indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> if we convert this conclusion in Celarent<br />

simply, we shall get our original conclusion.<br />

Convert the original minor, and transpose :<br />

No M is S,<br />

All P is M,<br />

from which in Celarent the conclusion is,<br />

No P is S,<br />

from which again by simple conversion,<br />

No S is P,<br />

which is the original conclusion.<br />

The process <strong>of</strong> Reduction in the case <strong>of</strong> the fourth figure<br />

has already been illustr<strong>at</strong>ed ( 9).<br />

This oper<strong>at</strong>ion, <strong>of</strong> direct applic<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Immedi<strong>at</strong>e<br />

Inference and transposition, is called direct reduction.<br />

By this means we are also said to reduce ostensively<br />

(SetKTt/oo?).<br />

Aristotle did not admit any Immedi<strong>at</strong>e<br />

Inference except conversion; and under this limit<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

we cannot reduce Baroco and Bocardo directly. Ac<br />

cordingly they are reduced by a distinct process known<br />

as reduction per impossibile (Sia rot) aSvvdrov)<br />

or in<br />

direct reduction : assume the falsity <strong>of</strong> the conclusion<br />

(i.e., the truth <strong>of</strong> its contradictory) ; take this contra<br />

dictory with one <strong>of</strong> the original premises, as the two<br />

premises <strong>of</strong> a new syllogism in Barbara, the con<br />

clusion <strong>of</strong> which will be incomp<strong>at</strong>ible with the other<br />

premise <strong>of</strong> the original syllogism. Hence either the<br />

original conclusion is true or one <strong>of</strong> the original<br />

premises false ; and, since in Deductive Logic the<br />

premises are always assumed to be true, we can only<br />

accept the former altern<strong>at</strong>ive.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!