10.04.2013 Views

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IMPORT OF PROPOSITIONS AND JUDGMENTS. 105<br />

The term which is larger<br />

in extension is smaller in<br />

comprehension, and vice versa ; hence the copula is has<br />

&quot;<br />

two meanings. For instance, the proposition Man is<br />

fallible,&quot; read in extension, means th<strong>at</strong> the class man is<br />

included in the class fallible beings ; read in compre<br />

hension, it means th<strong>at</strong> the complex concept man in<br />

cludes as part <strong>of</strong> itself the <strong>at</strong>tribute <strong>of</strong> fallibility. The<br />

former <strong>of</strong> the two interpret<strong>at</strong>ions is <strong>of</strong> course the class<br />

view with which we are familiar. The l<strong>at</strong>ter, known<br />

as the<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

comprehensive<br />

view <strong>of</strong> the proposition, re<br />

quires careful consider<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

We have found it necessary to assume th<strong>at</strong> the in<br />

tension <strong>of</strong> any term is rel<strong>at</strong>ively fixed (ch. II. 7) ;<br />

expressed in the Definition <strong>of</strong> the term, giving<br />

analytic proposition (ch.<br />

it is<br />

us an<br />

III. 2). The &quot;compre<br />

hensive view,&quot; if taken strictly and without qualific<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />

applies only to propositions where the predic<strong>at</strong>e st<strong>at</strong>es<br />

the meaning or part <strong>of</strong> the meaning <strong>of</strong> the subject-term.<br />

In any proposition which gives us inform<strong>at</strong>ion about a<br />

subject, the idea <strong>of</strong> the predic<strong>at</strong>e is not simply con<br />

tained in the idea <strong>of</strong> the subject. 1<br />

Hamilton s doctrine <strong>of</strong> the Quantific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Predic<strong>at</strong>e is a development <strong>of</strong> the class view <strong>of</strong> the<br />

proposition, but it is an inconsistent development.<br />

He adopts the four forms A, E, I, O, which depend<br />

on the predic<strong>at</strong>ive view, and then doubles them by<br />

<strong>at</strong>taching &quot;some&quot; and &quot;all&quot; to the predic<strong>at</strong>e. This<br />

is to abandon the predic<strong>at</strong>ive view and tre<strong>at</strong> the<br />

predic<strong>at</strong>e as a class ; and if we do this (see 2) we<br />

do not get eight forms <strong>of</strong> the proposition but only<br />

1 Nevertheless the point which Hamilton raises is a very import<br />

ant one ; further consider<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> its philosophical aspects will be<br />

found in ch. XI. 8 i.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!