10.04.2013 Views

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

66 THE LOGICAL PROPOSITION.<br />

(a] To have fine fe<strong>at</strong>hers<br />

(b] the sign <strong>of</strong> being a fine bird ;<br />

(c] denied <strong>of</strong> some instances <strong>of</strong> the subject.<br />

&quot;To have fine fe<strong>at</strong>hers is sometimes not the<br />

Hence SoP,<br />

a fine bird.&quot;<br />

sign <strong>of</strong> being<br />

&quot;<br />

(i i) Some <strong>of</strong> the English kings have been worthless.&quot;<br />

In order to deal with propositions referring to past time,<br />

some <strong>logic</strong>ians propose to turn them into propositions <strong>of</strong><br />

&quot; Some English kings are in the class<br />

classific<strong>at</strong>ion, thus :<br />

constituted by the <strong>at</strong>tribute <strong>of</strong> worthlessness <strong>at</strong> the given<br />

time.&quot; But it is not necessary to be so very cumbrous. It<br />

is true th<strong>at</strong> &quot;every act <strong>of</strong> judgment is a present<br />

one and<br />

expresses a present belief.&quot; But in a proposition referring<br />

to past or future time, the truth <strong>of</strong> the proposition lies in its<br />

reference to th<strong>at</strong> point <strong>of</strong> time ; and we may express the<br />

meaning formally by putting ourselves <strong>at</strong> th<strong>at</strong> point <strong>of</strong> time,<br />

and therefore using a proposition whose copula is in the<br />

&quot; Some English kings are worthless.&quot; Simi<br />

present tense :<br />

larly, &quot;all had fled&quot; may be expressed, &quot;all are persons<br />

who have fled.&quot;<br />

(12)<br />

&quot;<br />

Half <strong>of</strong> his answers are wrong.&quot;<br />

Here, if<br />

&quot;<br />

half&quot; is merely indefinite and means &quot;a good<br />

many,&quot; the proposition is obviously SiP. If we take it as<br />

it has to be tre<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

a numerical st<strong>at</strong>ement, strictly definite,<br />

as a compound proposition, and part <strong>of</strong> the meaning sacri<br />

ficed by analysing it into a pair <strong>of</strong> I propositions,<br />

( (a) Some <strong>of</strong> his answers are wrong.<br />

( (b] Some <strong>of</strong> his answers are not-wrong. 1<br />

But definite numerical st<strong>at</strong>ements cannot be fully dealt<br />

with in elementary Logic. Finding the formal expression<br />

<strong>of</strong> propositions like those given in examples u and 12 is an<br />

unpr<strong>of</strong>itable puzzle, for we do not succeed in expressing all<br />

their meaning.<br />

1<br />

It is worth noting th<strong>at</strong> the phrase &quot;half <strong>of</strong> his answers&quot; is not<br />

so precise as it looks. It is only abstractly precise.<br />

If it meant<br />

&quot;<br />

this half&quot; it would be really precise, and would be a singular (an<br />

A) proposition.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!