10.04.2013 Views

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE PROBLEMS WHICH WE HAVE RAISED. 351<br />

in scientific reasoning; for wh<strong>at</strong> we called the &quot;com<br />

plete scientific method,&quot; the Method <strong>of</strong> Explan<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />

necessarily includes both (ch. IX. 10). In the pres<br />

ent work we have not limited the meaning <strong>of</strong> Induction<br />

to th<strong>at</strong> kind <strong>of</strong> reasoning where we start with facts given<br />

together and have to find their real connecting prin<br />

ciple ; we have identified the theory <strong>of</strong> Induction with<br />

the theory <strong>of</strong> Scientific Method, and have said th<strong>at</strong><br />

Induction<br />

&quot;<br />

includes Deduction.&quot;<br />

In many passages in Mill s Logic<br />

we find Induction<br />

tre<strong>at</strong>ed as in the present work as the theory <strong>of</strong><br />

Scientific Method.<br />

St<strong>at</strong>ed in its most general terms, Induction (according<br />

to one line <strong>of</strong> thought in Mill) is the discovery and pro<strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> it<br />

&quot;general propositions&quot;:<br />

is &quot;th<strong>at</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

mind by which we infer th<strong>at</strong> wh<strong>at</strong> we know to be true in a<br />

particular case or cases will be true in all cases which<br />

resemble the former in<br />

other words, Induction<br />

&quot;<br />

certain assignable In<br />

respects.&quot;<br />

is the process by which we con<br />

clude th<strong>at</strong> wh<strong>at</strong> is true <strong>of</strong> certain individuals <strong>of</strong> a class<br />

is true <strong>of</strong> the whole class, or th<strong>at</strong> wh<strong>at</strong> is true <strong>at</strong> certain<br />

&quot;<br />

times will be true in similar circumstances <strong>at</strong> all times<br />

(111. ii. i). This evidently rests on the assumption <strong>of</strong> the<br />

&quot;uniformity <strong>of</strong> &quot;<br />

n<strong>at</strong>ure,&quot; which may be tre<strong>at</strong>ed as the ultim<br />

<strong>at</strong>e major premise <strong>of</strong> all inductions&quot; (III. iii.<br />

i). In say<br />

ing this, Mill evidently conceived th<strong>at</strong> a case <strong>of</strong> Induction<br />

could be expressed as a syllogism thus<br />

The same cause (or group <strong>of</strong> causes) will the same effect.<br />

always produce<br />

The causes ABCD have been observed to have the effect<br />

E.<br />

Therefore the causes ABCD will always have the effect<br />

E.<br />

Hence &quot;a single instance, in some cases, is sufficient for a<br />

complete induction&quot; (III. iii. 3) i.e., when the investiga<br />

tion <strong>of</strong> the single instance has been so thorough th<strong>at</strong> we can<br />

be sure <strong>of</strong> having grasped all the<br />

ABCD and <strong>of</strong> E being their effect.<br />

relevant circumstances<br />

Carrying on the same

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!