10.04.2013 Views

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AND THE LAWS OF THOUGHT. 43<br />

the same predic<strong>at</strong>e should both belong and not belong<br />

to the same thing <strong>at</strong> the same time and in the same way&quot;<br />

A thing may have different qualities <strong>at</strong> different times,<br />

as in the changes in a person s character ; and it may<br />

have a quality in one respect, and not have it in<br />

another, as in the celebr<strong>at</strong>ed shield th<strong>at</strong> was gold on<br />

one side and silver on the other ; but these facts do not<br />

conflict with the law <strong>of</strong> Contradiction as Aristotle st<strong>at</strong>es<br />

it. Aristotle points out th<strong>at</strong> the denial <strong>of</strong> this principle<br />

would be the denial <strong>of</strong> the very possibility <strong>of</strong> thinking.<br />

13. The law <strong>of</strong> Excluded Middle says th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

two propositions A is B and A is not one must<br />

B,&quot;<br />

be true and the other false. In this form the principle<br />

and the student will observe<br />

was laid down by Aristotle ;<br />

its close connection with the principles <strong>of</strong> Identity and<br />

Contradiction as regards the meanings <strong>of</strong> terms and the<br />

consistency <strong>of</strong> propositions. The applic<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

principle is plain in proportion as A and B are exactly<br />

defined. If we are in doubt as to where one thing<br />

begins and another ends, we are in doubt as to the<br />

precise applic<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> our principle. This may happen<br />

in cases where we do not find a perfectly definite limit<br />

to an event in space or time e.g., when something is<br />

&quot;in the act&quot; <strong>of</strong> occurring, we seem unable to say,<br />

&quot;<br />

either it has happened or it has not The<br />

happened.&quot;<br />

sun may be just &quot;rising&quot; without &quot;having<br />

&quot;<br />

not having<br />

a precise meaning to<br />

risen&quot; or<br />

risen.&quot; But as soon as we have <strong>at</strong>tached<br />

&quot;<br />

rising,&quot; in the case <strong>of</strong> the sun,<br />

e.g., if we make it mean th<strong>at</strong> the actual globe<br />

is visible<br />

above the true horizon, then the law <strong>of</strong> excluded<br />

middle is applicable. When we are speaking <strong>of</strong> n<strong>at</strong>ural<br />

qualities such as he<strong>at</strong>, which always have degrees, then<br />

again we cannot say th<strong>at</strong> a body must either<br />

&quot;<br />

be<br />

&quot;<br />

hot<br />

or<br />

&quot;<br />

not be<br />

&quot;<br />

hot until we know th<strong>at</strong> some definite

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!