10.04.2013 Views

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AND THE ARISTOTELIAN SYLLOGISM. 139<br />

(a) The major premise must be universal.<br />

(b) The minor premise must be affirm<strong>at</strong>ive. These<br />

are called the special rules or canons <strong>of</strong> the first figure,<br />

to distinguish them from the general rules ( 4) which<br />

are applicable to all the figures.<br />

The usual st<strong>at</strong>ement <strong>of</strong> the Aristotelian canon is<br />

called the dictum de omni et de nullo. It has come<br />

down to us from the mediaeval <strong>logic</strong>ians :<br />

1 Wh<strong>at</strong>ever<br />

is predic<strong>at</strong>ed, affirm<strong>at</strong>ively or neg<strong>at</strong>ively, <strong>of</strong> a whole<br />

class, must be predic<strong>at</strong>ed, affirm<strong>at</strong>ively or neg<strong>at</strong>ively,<br />

<strong>of</strong> everything contained under th<strong>at</strong> class. The affir<br />

m<strong>at</strong>ive predic<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the class is de omni, the neg<strong>at</strong>ive<br />

de nullo. The applic<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> this to the rules <strong>of</strong> the<br />

first figure is obvious. The major premise makes a<br />

st<strong>at</strong>ement about a whole class, so th<strong>at</strong> it must be<br />

universal, and may be neg<strong>at</strong>ive ;<br />

the minor asserts th<strong>at</strong><br />

a given case comes under th<strong>at</strong> class, so th<strong>at</strong> it must<br />

be affirm<strong>at</strong>ive ; and, in accordance with the dictum,<br />

the conclusion makes the original st<strong>at</strong>ement <strong>of</strong> the<br />

given case.<br />

The first figure is <strong>of</strong> the gre<strong>at</strong>est importance both in<br />

science and practical life. Whenever we apply previous<br />

knowledge to a given case, we employ one <strong>of</strong> the moods<br />

<strong>of</strong> this figure, although no syllogism and even no<br />

distinct propositions may be before our minds. Some<br />

times even an ordinary &quot;judgment <strong>of</strong> perception,&quot; or<br />

recognition <strong>of</strong> an object, may be analysed in this form.<br />

The minor premise being our perception <strong>of</strong> the general<br />

qualities <strong>of</strong> the particular fact, may be placed first.<br />

1 Aristotle did not st<strong>at</strong>e it in terms <strong>of</strong> the<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

class view <strong>of</strong> pro<br />

positions : 6TO.V tTepov Kad erepou KaTTiyoprJTai ws Ka6 uTro/cei/xeVou,<br />

tt&a Kara TOV KaT7]yopovfj.evov Aeyercu, irdvTa Kal Kara TOV vTroKi/j.ei&amp;gt;ov<br />

p7/07)(reTcu (C<strong>at</strong>., 3) i.e., wh<strong>at</strong>ever is said <strong>of</strong> the Predic<strong>at</strong>e is said<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Subject.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!