10.04.2013 Views

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

32<br />

THE NAME, THE TERM, THE CONCEPT,<br />

the known qualities common to the members <strong>of</strong> the<br />

class. But with the growth <strong>of</strong> experience and knowledge,<br />

we usually find th<strong>at</strong> many <strong>of</strong> these known qualities are<br />

unessential, and some are insignificant from every point<br />

<strong>of</strong> view, and we simply leave them out <strong>of</strong> account in<br />

forming our idea ;<br />

hence they do not form part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

connot<strong>at</strong>ion. It is sufficient if the connot<strong>at</strong>ion includes<br />

the &quot;important&quot; or &quot;essential&quot; <strong>at</strong>tributes. The con<br />

not<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> &quot;man&quot; does not include an idea <strong>of</strong> the<br />

peculiar shape <strong>of</strong> the known<br />

ears, <strong>of</strong> the capacity for laughter,<br />

and other<br />

&quot;<br />

qualities common to the class.&quot;<br />

There is a third possible meaning <strong>of</strong> connot<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />

th<strong>at</strong> it is all the qualities <strong>of</strong> the thing (or class), whether<br />

known to man or not. The word is not employed in<br />

this sense, for it would introduce fundamental confusion<br />

into Logic. If we assume th<strong>at</strong> Tennyson s well-known<br />

lines on the<br />

&quot;<br />

flower in the crannied wall&quot; express a<br />

philosophical truth, th<strong>at</strong> the complete and perfect<br />

knowledge <strong>of</strong> the flower would involve the knowledge<br />

<strong>of</strong> &quot;wh<strong>at</strong> God and Man is,&quot; then, using &quot;connot<strong>at</strong>ion&quot;<br />

in the sense th<strong>at</strong> we now speak <strong>of</strong>, God, Man, and the<br />

whole universe would be part <strong>of</strong> the connot<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

flower. But<br />

&quot;<br />

complete and perfect<br />

&quot;<br />

knowledge is an<br />

ideal so far beyond our present <strong>at</strong>tainment, th<strong>at</strong> we have<br />

no right to say wh<strong>at</strong> it would or would not imply.<br />

Our result is therefore as follows. The question for<br />

Logic is never wh<strong>at</strong> a name means for you or me, but<br />

always wh<strong>at</strong> it ought to mean. <strong>An</strong>d wh<strong>at</strong> it ought to<br />

mean must be something definitely fixed, the idea <strong>of</strong> the<br />

important qualities : or, expressing this in other words,<br />

the qualities on account <strong>of</strong> which the name is given, and<br />

in the absence <strong>of</strong> which it would be denied. Our idea <strong>of</strong><br />

these depends on our knowledge <strong>of</strong> the things referred to<br />

by the name, and will change as th<strong>at</strong> knowledge grows ;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!