10.04.2013 Views

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE VALIDITY OF THE SYLLOGISM. 215<br />

effect, <strong>of</strong> resemblance and difference, seem to involve<br />

distinct laws <strong>of</strong> thought, to cre<strong>at</strong>e for themselves special<br />

elements and functions <strong>of</strong> language, and to require<br />

special canons <strong>of</strong> <strong>logic</strong>. In all these spheres there is<br />

room for such a necessary nexus <strong>of</strong> conceptions as<br />

demonstr<strong>at</strong>ion requires ; yet the rules <strong>of</strong> class-reasoning<br />

[the syllogism] have no n<strong>at</strong>ural applic<strong>at</strong>ion. Such<br />

maxims as th<strong>at</strong> a body cannot be in two places <strong>at</strong> once,<br />

th<strong>at</strong> causa causa causa caus<strong>at</strong>i, th<strong>at</strong> two things, <strong>of</strong><br />

which the first is like and the second unlike a third, are<br />

unlike each other, are not less really the basis <strong>of</strong><br />

frequent reasoning than the dictum<br />

the is genus true <strong>of</strong> the species.&quot;<br />

th<strong>at</strong> wh<strong>at</strong> is true <strong>of</strong><br />

Mr Bradley, in his<br />

Principles <strong>of</strong> Logic,<br />

has worked out a classific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong><br />

the most important types <strong>of</strong> rel<strong>at</strong>ion which ordinary<br />

judgments express, among which the syllogism takes<br />

its place, as dealing with propositions th<strong>at</strong> express the<br />

rel<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> subject and <strong>at</strong>tribute. Against this doctrine<br />

the following remarks must be made. One may put the<br />

m<strong>at</strong>ter as a question <strong>of</strong> verbal definition, or as a question<br />

<strong>of</strong> the meaning <strong>of</strong> the dictum de omni. (i) If by a syl<br />

logism we mean a piece <strong>of</strong><br />

&quot;<br />

class-reasoning,&quot; formul<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

in such a way as always to conform to the type :<br />

Each <strong>of</strong> the individuals which make up<br />

M, is P ;<br />

A is one <strong>of</strong> these ;<br />

. . A is P ;<br />

the class<br />

then there are inferences, scientifically certain, which<br />

are not<br />

&quot;<br />

syllogisms,&quot; and the syllogism is wh<strong>at</strong> Mill con<br />

sidered it to be (see below, 8 ad finem). But (2) if we<br />

interpret the dictum as Aristotle does, for, when st<strong>at</strong>ing<br />

it (see p. 139, note), Aristotle says nothing about classes,<br />

genera, or species; and if we regard the &quot;wording&quot; or

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!