10.04.2013 Views

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

114 IMPORT OF PROPOSITIONS AND JUDGMENTS.<br />

Wh<strong>at</strong> different views have been held as to the n<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong><br />

Predic<strong>at</strong>ion ? [O.]<br />

(2) Explain and discuss carefully the following theories <strong>of</strong><br />

the judgment :<br />

<strong>of</strong> two ideas.&quot;<br />

(a) &quot;Judgment is the comparison<br />

(fy &quot;Judgment<br />

is the st<strong>at</strong>ement <strong>of</strong> a rel<strong>at</strong>ion between<br />

(c)<br />

<strong>at</strong>tributes.&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

Judgment is the reference <strong>of</strong> a significant idea to<br />

Reality.&quot; [St A.]<br />

(3) Explain and discuss the view th<strong>at</strong> the itltim<strong>at</strong>e subject<br />

<strong>of</strong> every judgment is reality. [St A.]<br />

(4) Wh<strong>at</strong> objections lie against the view th<strong>at</strong> the predic<strong>at</strong>e<br />

<strong>of</strong> a <strong>logic</strong>al proposition should be written as a quantity ? [O.]<br />

(5) Bring out the meaning <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the following<br />

&quot;<br />

accounts <strong>of</strong> the proposition All men are mortal,&quot; and say<br />

which is <strong>logic</strong>ally to be preferred :<br />

(a) All men have the <strong>at</strong>tribute mortality.<br />

(b) Men mortal men.<br />

(c) Men form part <strong>of</strong> the class mortals.<br />

(d) If a subject has the <strong>at</strong>tributes <strong>of</strong> a man, it also has<br />

the <strong>at</strong>tribute mortality. [L.]<br />

(6) Examine the case for expressing propositions in the<br />

form <strong>of</strong> Equ<strong>at</strong>ions (a) from the theoretic, (b) from the<br />

practical point <strong>of</strong> view. [L.]<br />

(7) St<strong>at</strong>e the chief theories <strong>of</strong> the Import <strong>of</strong> Propositions.<br />

On wh<strong>at</strong> theory does the adoption <strong>of</strong> A, E, I, and O, as the<br />

fundamental forms, rest ? Criticise the additional forms<br />

which arise when the quantific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the Predic<strong>at</strong>e is<br />

adopted. [C.]<br />

(8) Explain the precise meaning <strong>of</strong> the &quot;<br />

proposition Some<br />

&quot;<br />

X s are not some Y s (the proposition w <strong>of</strong> Thomson). Wh<strong>at</strong><br />

is its contradictory ? Give your opinion <strong>of</strong> its importance. [L.]<br />

(9) Examine critically the view th<strong>at</strong> the significance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

proposition<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

All S is P is fully and best given in the form<br />

There is no S which is not-P.&quot; [L.]<br />

(10) Wh<strong>at</strong> do you consider to be the essential distinction<br />

between the Subject and Predic<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> a Judgment?<br />

Apply your answer to the :<br />

following<br />

&quot; From hence thy warrant is thy sword.&quot;<br />

* Th<strong>at</strong> is exactly wh<strong>at</strong> I wanted.&quot; [C.]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!