10.04.2013 Views

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

340 THE PROBLEMS WHICH WE HAVE RAISED.<br />

is the reference <strong>of</strong> a significant idea to a Subject in<br />

Reality by means <strong>of</strong> an identity <strong>of</strong> content between<br />

them. The &quot;Subject<br />

in Reality&quot;<br />

is the individual<br />

thing (or things) <strong>of</strong> which we have spoken ; the<br />

&quot;identity <strong>of</strong> content&quot; may be explained by<br />

an ex<br />

ample which Mr Bosanquet gives. &quot;When I say,<br />

This table is made <strong>of</strong> oak, the table is given in per<br />

ception ;<br />

. . . among<br />

its qualities<br />

it has a certain<br />

grain and colour in the wood. I know the grain<br />

and colour <strong>of</strong> oak-wood, and if they are the same<br />

as those <strong>of</strong> the table, then the meaning<br />

or content<br />

made <strong>of</strong> oak coalesces with this point in reality ;<br />

and ... I am able to say, This table is made <strong>of</strong> oak-<br />

wood<br />

&quot;<br />

(Essentials <strong>of</strong> Logic, p. 70). We have before<br />

our mind, in perception or otherwise, a real subject,<br />

about which we judge ; having also before our mind<br />

a previously formed concept<br />

which is identical with<br />

certain fe<strong>at</strong>ures or aspects <strong>of</strong> the subject, we <strong>at</strong>tach<br />

it as predic<strong>at</strong>e.<br />

5. When we examine the rel<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> affirm<strong>at</strong>ive<br />

to neg<strong>at</strong>ive judgments (ch.<br />

III. p. 52), we see th<strong>at</strong> even<br />

a neg<strong>at</strong>ive judgment refers to reality, and implies th<strong>at</strong><br />

reality is inconsistent with a suggested assertion.<br />

Aristotle says emph<strong>at</strong>ically,<br />

&quot;<br />

There is one primary<br />

assertive ^,0709,<br />

affirm<strong>at</strong>ion ; then there is denial ;<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

affirm<strong>at</strong>ion is prior in thought to denial (De Int., c. 5,<br />

<strong>An</strong>. Post., I. 25; cf. Poetics, c. 20). This st<strong>at</strong>es a<br />

fact which will be evident on a little reflection. Nega<br />

tive propositions have the function <strong>of</strong> simply averting<br />

error. In real thought and speech we never make a<br />

denial unless there has been some affirm<strong>at</strong>ion suggested,<br />

imagined, or actually made, and we wish to deny it ;<br />

and the reason why we deny it is th<strong>at</strong> we believe<br />

we have grounds for another assertion which is incom-<br />

&quot;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!