10.04.2013 Views

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AND THE LAWS OF THOUGHT. 19<br />

mass as a whole, but common as applicable in the same<br />

sense to different portions<br />

already noticed this (Topics, I. ch. vii.)<br />

<strong>of</strong> the mass. Aristotle had<br />

: &quot;The case <strong>of</strong><br />

w<strong>at</strong>er from the same well differs from the usual case <strong>of</strong><br />

objects being members <strong>of</strong> the same class only in th<strong>at</strong><br />

the degree <strong>of</strong> resemblance between the objects is higher<br />

in the former.&quot;<br />

(c) A collective name is the name <strong>of</strong> a group <strong>of</strong><br />

similar things regarded as a whole, the name not being<br />

applicable to the things taken one by one. Collective<br />

in South<br />

names may be singular, as, &quot;the British Army<br />

Africa,&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

the present House <strong>of</strong> Commons&quot;; or common,<br />

as &quot;a committee,&quot; &quot;a<br />

library.&quot; Where a name may be<br />

used in both ways, the collective and distributive mean<br />

ings must be carefully distinguished. Thus the name<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

committee is used distributively as being applicable<br />

to each one <strong>of</strong> the many different groups<br />

formed in the<br />

manner, and with the object, which the name signifies.<br />

But as applied to any particular one <strong>of</strong> these groups, its<br />

use is not distributive but collective ; it cannot be given<br />

to each or to any member composing the group, but<br />

only to all the members together.<br />

This distinction is <strong>of</strong> gre<strong>at</strong> importance ; and the neglect <strong>of</strong><br />

it may lead to serious fallacies or mistakes in reasoning.<br />

The word<br />

&quot;<br />

all,&quot;<br />

for instance, may be used either collectively<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

all men may mean any man,&quot; or<br />

&quot;<br />

all<br />

i.e., the human race as a whole. <strong>An</strong>d wh<strong>at</strong> is<br />

or distributively ;<br />

&quot;<br />

men together<br />

true <strong>of</strong> &quot;all&quot; collectively may not be true <strong>of</strong> &quot;all&quot; distribu<br />

tively, or vice-versa. It is not easy to give simple examples<br />

where the distinction covers a really deep difference <strong>of</strong> mean<br />

ing, for such cases usually occur in the discussion <strong>of</strong> difficult<br />

questions in ethics or philosophy. Consider Kant s dictum,<br />

&quot;ought implies can.&quot; We may interpret this in the sense<br />

th<strong>at</strong> &quot;man is capable <strong>of</strong> realising every ideal which he is<br />

capable <strong>of</strong> presenting<br />

to himself.&quot; Understood distribu-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!