10.04.2013 Views

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

158<br />

MEDIATE INFERENCE<br />

principle, or by bringing it under a higher class : then the<br />

dictum <strong>of</strong> Aristotle is directly applicable, and the figure is<br />

the first. If the argument aims <strong>at</strong> a neg<strong>at</strong>ive conclusion,<br />

separ<strong>at</strong>ing two things by reasoning<br />

from the fact th<strong>at</strong> an<br />

<strong>at</strong>tribute which is characteristic <strong>of</strong> one is absent in the<br />

other ; the figure is the second. If the argument aims<br />

<strong>at</strong> establishing a rule, a general or partly general st<strong>at</strong>e<br />

ment by an instance; or if it endeavours to deny such a rule<br />

by means <strong>of</strong> a neg<strong>at</strong>ive instance: then the figure is the third.<br />

In order to express the argument strictly in the<br />

form <strong>of</strong> mood and figure,<br />

it is usually necessary to<br />

make changes in the given expression <strong>of</strong> it, supplying<br />

any premise which may be understood but not ex<br />

pressed, according to Hamilton s postul<strong>at</strong>e, th<strong>at</strong> wh<strong>at</strong><br />

is implicit in thought may be made explicit in language<br />

(ch. III.<br />

4).<br />

It is a mistake to say, as Jevons does,<br />

th<strong>at</strong> such changes &quot;are <strong>of</strong> an extra-<strong>logic</strong>al character,<br />

and belong more properly to<br />

&quot;<br />

the science <strong>of</strong> language ;<br />

for they are changes made in order th<strong>at</strong> the words<br />

may express the true <strong>logic</strong>al rel<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> the thoughts.<br />

Jevons quotes from the Port Royal Logic two examples<br />

<strong>of</strong> arguments which, he says, &quot;cannot be proved by the<br />

rules <strong>of</strong> the syllogism,&quot; and yet are perfectly valid. The<br />

examples are : &quot;<br />

(a) The sun is a thing insensible the<br />

;<br />

Persians worship the sun therefore the Persians ; worship<br />

a thing insensible.&quot; (b} &quot;The Divine Law commands us<br />

to honour kings Louis XIV. is a ;<br />

Divine Law commands us to honour<br />

king ;<br />

Louis<br />

therefore the<br />

XIV.&quot; Now<br />

if we were limited to making merely gramm<strong>at</strong>ical changes<br />

in these arguments, it would be difficult if not impossible<br />

to express them as strict syllogisms. But it should have<br />

been evident th<strong>at</strong> they can be so expressed. The first<br />

<strong>of</strong> them adduces an instance in support <strong>of</strong> the general<br />

st<strong>at</strong>ement th<strong>at</strong> Persians are worshippers <strong>of</strong> a thing insen<br />

sible, hence it is <strong>of</strong> the type <strong>of</strong> fig. iii. ; the second is an<br />

applic<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> a general principle, and hence is <strong>of</strong> the<br />

type <strong>of</strong> fig.<br />

i. The arguments may be expressed syllo-<br />

gistically in Darapti and Barbara respectively :

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!