10.04.2013 Views

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DEFINITION. 177<br />

said (<strong>An</strong>. Post., ii. 10) th<strong>at</strong> a nominal definition gives<br />

the current meaning <strong>of</strong> a term, as when thunder is said<br />

&quot;<br />

to be &quot;a noise in the clouds,&quot; or a house<br />

a building in<br />

which people live.&quot; A verbal or nominal definition need<br />

not have even the implic<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> real existence added<br />

it may be <strong>of</strong> things afterwards shown to be impossible<br />

e.g.,<br />

&quot;<br />

perpetual motion<br />

&quot;<br />

or<br />

&quot;<br />

squaring the circle.&quot; But<br />

sometimes this verbal definition has added to it the<br />

postul<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> real existence or validity, as in the examples<br />

given above (cp. also <strong>An</strong>. Post, i. i). A real definition<br />

is the st<strong>at</strong>ement <strong>of</strong> wh<strong>at</strong> is essential to the fact in ques<br />

tion as a m<strong>at</strong>ter <strong>of</strong> science. In fact, Aristotle s dis<br />

tinction practically coincides with th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> definition as<br />

the beginning and as the end <strong>of</strong> knowledge ; in this<br />

sense we must retain it, but we need not distinguish<br />

the two types <strong>of</strong> definition as &quot;nominal&quot; and &quot;real.&quot;<br />

Modern writers usually express the distinction in<br />

terms similar to those <strong>of</strong> Aristotle,<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

nominal<br />

&quot;<br />

and<br />

&quot;<br />

real but ; scarcely two <strong>of</strong> them explain it alike. If<br />

we retain this expression <strong>of</strong> it, we must remember th<strong>at</strong><br />

all definitions define the meanings <strong>of</strong> terms or names,<br />

and so may be called<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

nominal<br />

: while on the other<br />

hand, some definitions evidently have a direct reference<br />

to a real thing, others, again, evidently aim first <strong>of</strong> all<br />

<strong>at</strong> fixing the meaning <strong>of</strong> a term, and have only an in<br />

direct reference to reality. Even this distinction does<br />

not go deep. For as Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Sidgwick has observed,<br />

we never define a term for its own sake merely, but in<br />

order to understand the things to which it refers. A<br />

mere word, apart from the things for which it stands,<br />

has no interest for us.<br />

&quot; The truth is, as most readers<br />

<strong>of</strong> Pl<strong>at</strong>o know, only<br />

it is a truth difficult to retain and<br />

apply, th<strong>at</strong> wh<strong>at</strong> we gain by discussing a definition is<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten but slightly represented by the superior fitness <strong>of</strong><br />

M

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!