10.04.2013 Views

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

44<br />

THE NAME, THE TERM, THE CONCEPT,<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> he<strong>at</strong> is signified by th<strong>at</strong> word. <strong>An</strong>d in the<br />

case <strong>of</strong> the gre<strong>at</strong> divisions <strong>of</strong> N<strong>at</strong>ure, which seem to<br />

shade <strong>of</strong>f into one another, as &quot;animal&quot; into &quot;veget<br />

able,&quot; and &quot;vegetable&quot; into &quot;inanim<strong>at</strong>e<br />

m<strong>at</strong>ter,&quot;<br />

may be in doubt as to the applic<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the law <strong>of</strong><br />

excluded middle to an individual on the borderline <strong>of</strong><br />

one <strong>of</strong> these divisions ; we may not be able to say<br />

either th<strong>at</strong> it is an animal or th<strong>at</strong> it is not an animal,<br />

it may seem to be something between the two. But<br />

this results from our imperfect understanding <strong>of</strong> wh<strong>at</strong><br />

animal life really is ; the gre<strong>at</strong>er the light which is<br />

thrown on this problem, the smaller the extent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

doubtful borderland, <strong>of</strong> things which seem neither in the<br />

class <strong>of</strong><br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

animal life nor outside it.<br />

Sometimes the law <strong>of</strong> excluded middle has been<br />

questioned through<br />

we<br />

a mere confusion. The contrast<br />

which the law <strong>of</strong> thought makes, is between two pro<br />

positions one <strong>of</strong> which simply<br />

denies or contradicts<br />

the other, between an affirm<strong>at</strong>ive and a neg<strong>at</strong>ive pro<br />

position, &quot;This w<strong>at</strong>er is hot, this w<strong>at</strong>er is not hot,&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

This paper is white, this paper is not white,&quot;<br />

&quot;This line is longer than th<strong>at</strong>, this line is not longer<br />

than th<strong>at</strong>,&quot; &quot;This opinion is simply true [i.e., true with<br />

out qualific<strong>at</strong>ion or limit<strong>at</strong>ion], this opinion is simply<br />

not true.&quot; In each <strong>of</strong> these pairs <strong>of</strong> propositions, one<br />

and one only must be true ; there is no third altern<strong>at</strong>ive.<br />

But it is not uncommon to apply the law to a pair<br />

<strong>of</strong> propositions which affirm contrary predic<strong>at</strong>es <strong>of</strong> an<br />

object, and to say (taking the last <strong>of</strong> the above examples)<br />

th<strong>at</strong> &quot;either this opinion is simply true or it is simply<br />

false.&quot; Here there may be a third altern<strong>at</strong>ive, it may<br />

be a mixture <strong>of</strong> truth and error.<br />

&quot;white&quot; and &quot;black,&quot;<br />

Similarly, between<br />

&quot;hot&quot; and &quot;cold,&quot; &quot;gre<strong>at</strong>er<br />

than,&quot; and &quot;less<br />

than,&quot; in each case there are other

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!