10.04.2013 Views

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

34<br />

THE PROBLEMS WHICH WE HAVE RAISED.<br />

judgment,&quot; in its most abstract form,<br />

still contains a<br />

reference to reality, though not necessarily to any par<br />

ticular objects in the real world. The more abstract it<br />

becomes, the more it tends to take the hypothetical<br />

form ; in th<strong>at</strong> case as Mr Bradley says its truth lies<br />

in its affirm<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the connection <strong>of</strong> the then with the<br />

if; th<strong>at</strong> is, the affirm<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the existence in reality<br />

&quot;<br />

<strong>of</strong> such a general law as would, if we suppose some<br />

conditions present, produce a certain result.&quot; Because<br />

the hypothetical proposition &quot;if S is M it is P&quot; is<br />

capable <strong>of</strong> the implic<strong>at</strong>ion just mentioned, it is capable<br />

<strong>of</strong> being used as a significant portion <strong>of</strong> scientific know<br />

ledge (ch. VIII. i); in Aristotelian language,<br />

it can<br />

be used as a &quot;major premise.&quot; But before we can<br />

&quot;draw a conclusion&quot; from it, its general reference to<br />

reality requires to be particularised, by being connected<br />

with some actual case in space and time i.e., it re<br />

quires<br />

a &quot;minor<br />

premise.&quot; In the absence <strong>of</strong> this<br />

particular reference, the judgment in its hypothetical<br />

form gives us no inform<strong>at</strong>ion about anything in ex<br />

be used<br />

perience ; this is why the conditional form may<br />

to express ignorance: &quot;z/S is M it is P (but I do not<br />

know whether it is M or But even not).&quot; then the<br />

ignorance is only about the particular case ; the positive<br />

assertion <strong>of</strong> the general connection <strong>of</strong> P with M is<br />

evidently implied.<br />

Now, in the disjunctive judgment both these sides<br />

can<br />

(ch.<br />

be detected, but both possess fuller significance<br />

VII.<br />

6). The particular reference is less in<br />

determin<strong>at</strong>e than in the hypothetical; and the general<br />

implic<strong>at</strong>ion is larger. &quot;A is either B or C.&quot; &quot;Even<br />

if you do not know which <strong>of</strong> the two it<br />

&quot;<br />

know th<strong>at</strong> it must be one ?<br />

is, how do you<br />

Evidently we cannot make<br />

such an assertion about A without knowing something

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!